A view of the Gorean Lifestyle and Philosophy based on the Books
Posted on 2020-05-19 by Azrael Phoenix
“I do not insist that my argument is right in all other respects, but I would contend at all costs both in word and deed as far as I could that we will be better men, braver and less idle, if we believe that one must search for the things one does not know, rather than if we believe that it is not possible to find out what we do not know and that we must not look for it.”
Socrates
In January 2002, I began writing a column for the Gorean Voice, an online magazine that deals with Gorean issues. My column consists of a series of articles that deal with a myriad of aspects of the philosophy of Gor. These articles have covered a wide spectrum of philosophical issues, ranging from general topics such as metaphysics and epistemology to more specific topics such as virtue ethics and Plato’s The Republic.
These articles were intended to make people think, to contemplate questions related to Gorean philosophy. The articles might even convince a few people to consider adopting a Gorean philosophy into their lives. I am now placing these articles onto my website. The essays are largely unchanged except for some minor revisions. Additional essays from the Gorean Voice will be added in the future as well. It is also possible that some of these essays will see a more substantial expansion in the future.
Some Preliminary Matters
Let me begin with a caveat, that the opinions expressed in this series of essays are mine alone and as such are susceptible to all the normal vagaries of opinions. But, I do feel that my opinions are firmly grounded and well researched. They are based upon multiple readings and studies of all of the Gor novels, all of Norman’s other written works, and additional extensive readings and studies into philosophy, science, psychology and history.
In addition, one of my majors in college was philosophy. Personally, I choose to live by a Gorean philosophy in my life though I do not consider myself a Gorean lifestyler, by its most common definition. I simply see no reason in my own life for the necessity of trying to emulate the societal and cultural institutions of Gor. Others have different desires and that is fully their prerogative.
Some initial clarification is necessary to delineate the scope and direction of this series. The philosophy of Gor and the Gorean lifestyle, though related, are still separate entities. The most common definition of a lifestyler is one who follows a Gorean philosophy AND also emulates some of the societal and cultural institutions of Gor such as slavery, the Caste system or the Home Stone.
The Gorean philosophy consists of the underlying principles of the Gorean world, separate from their manifestation into man-made institutions. One could create a more expansive definition of a lifestyler to include those who just follow a Gorean philosophy, but that would not be its most common usage. The key here is that one does not need to be a called a lifestyler (as it is commonly defined) to follow a Gorean philosophy in their life. I am not denigrating the lifestyle here, only trying to properly define the terms, by their most common usage, that will be used in these articles.
Even though the societal and cultural institutions of Gor most often derive from the philosophy, that derivation is not a logical necessity. Other institutions, some drastically different, could be derived from that same philosophy. For example, the barbarian cultures of Gor possess some drastically different societal and cultural institutions than the civilized cities of Gor, yet they all follow the same basic philosophy.
These institutions may even vary from city to city. Thus, those institutions are generally unimportant to a comprehension of the philosophy except as examples of one possible method of the enactment of the philosophy. They are also unnecessary to actually living according to the philosophy. You do not need to own a slave or possess a Home Stone to live according to a Gorean philosophy.
If we examine the books, trying to separate the philosophy from the societal and cultural institutions, we can see that those matters that may seem most abhorrent to our own moral sense, such as human sacrifice or legal slavery, belong to the category of societal and cultural institutions. Fortunately, such matters are unnecessary if we are only concerned with the philosophy. Any philosophy, in its application into a societal or cultural institution, can be abused or twisted but that does not invalidate the underlying philosophy.
Consider how Christianity has been twisted over the centuries into such matters as the Inquisition and Crusades. Consider how Nietzsche’s philosophy, though he despised anti-Semitism, was twisted by the Nazis for their own sinister purposes. Do not equate what you might see as “brutality” within the Gor books as indicative of what the philosophy actually entails. Look below the surface to find its roots. A mere surface reading of the books is insufficient to properly understand its depths.
Not everyone believes that the Gorean philosophy is valid or worthy. But, if we analyze the efforts of these critics of Gor, we can see that their primary criticisms concern the societal and cultural institutions of Gor rather than the actual philosophy. The existence of forced slavery in the books is an often touted “evil” of Gor despite it not being an aspect of the philosophy. Thus, those criticisms have no correlation to the philosophy. If anything, the critics often deny even the existence of any Gorean philosophy.
On those rare occasions when they do contest particular aspects of the philosophy, they more often that not misunderstand and misrepresent what are the actual philosophical principles of Gor. For example, some critics claim that the Gorean philosophy stands for the proposition that women are inferior to men. This is completely wrong and is not a Gorean proposition. Gor depicts men and women as simply different, not that women are inherently inferior to men. The critics need to better understand what they wish to oppose. And if they truly understood the Gorean philosophy, most of them might not be so critical.
So what is the reason to present this series of articles? I think that discussions of the actual philosophy underlying Gor are far too uncommon online. When philosophical topics are raised on message boards, they often garner few replies. There are many more discussions on the practicalities of living a Gorean lifestyle today, on the emulation of the societal and cultural institutions of Gor.
Just look at how prevalent are the discussions of slavery on websites and message boards. There is no other topic that garners half as much attention as slavery. But, I believe that the Gorean philosophy is of significant importance and that it warrants much more discussion than it currently receives. This series will be an effort to raise the awareness level of the philosophy and hopefully institute some meaningful dialogue on the subject matter.
There would be no lifestyle without the Gorean philosophy. The philosophy is the required foundation for the lifestyle. And if one wishes to follow a Gorean philosophy in their lives, it is essential that they understand fully what they are trying to follow. Otherwise, they do a disservice to themselves.
One could convert to Catholicism, and then go to Mass, receive the Eucharist and go to confession. But, unless they understood the basics of the faith, the essential fundamentals of that faith, they would only be going through the motions. And no one should just “go through the motions” in their chosen lifestyle. Comprehension is essential and highly beneficial.
Introduction to Gorean Philosophy
“Philosophy begins when one learns to doubt–particularly to doubt one’s cherished beliefs, one’s dogmas and one’s axioms. Who knows how these cherished beliefs become certainties with us, and whether some secret wish did not furtively beget them, clothing desire in the dress of thought? There is no real philosophy until the mind turns round and examines itself.”
The Story of Philosophy by Will Durant
What is the Gorean philosophy?
Let us break that question down. What is Gorean? What is philosophy?
Before we can begin to discuss this fascinating subject, we must first try to define our terms. Without a common definitional basis, there might be confusion and misinterpretation. It is far better to try to circumvent those potential problems at the start. Socrates was an ardent advocate of the great importance of defining terms when discussing philosophical issues. Please also understand that these definitions are geared specifically to pertain to the subject matter at hand. As such, these definitions may not be appropriate in a different context.
We shall begin our discussion by first trying to define “philosophy.” The term “philosophy” is derived from two Greek words that literally translates as “lover of wisdom.” The proper definition of philosophy though remains a bone of contention even to modern day philosophers. Thus, many different definitions exist, varying from the simple to the complex. So, what are we to do? Which definition would be best for our purposes?
Well, if we are to discuss a Gorean philosophy, then maybe we should consult Norman, a philosophy professor, for his own definition of philosophy. But, that is not to be found within the Gorean series. Fortunately, Norman’s book “The Cognitivity Paradox” (published under his real name John Lange) provides us with just such a definition. This book also points out the weaknesses of numerous other definitions of philosophy and is highly recommended for anyone interested in Gorean philosophy or philosophy in general.
Norman defines philosophy simple as “a proposal,” something essentially offered for consideration, a matter to be discussed and examined. In general, a proposal would not be considered to have a truth-value in the ordinary sense. It is not something we would commonly assess as either just true or false. But, nearly all philosophers would contend that philosophy can be cognitive, that it can have a truth-value, so they might contest Norman’s definition.
They would see philosophy as having far greater worth than merely being a proposal. But, Norman avoids this criticism by choosing to extend the meaning of truth-value to create a derivative cognitivity that is applicable to such proposals. Obviously some proposals are better than others and it is possible that some proposal can even be considered the best. Thus, if a set of conditions are devised to judge a proposal, based on some ideal, then those conditions could be used to assess its truth-value. We shall return to Norman’s definition later in this series to assess the cognitivity of the Gorean philosophy.
Academically, philosophy has four primary components: logic, metaphysics, epistemology and ethics. Logic is essentially concerned with correct methods of reasoning, how we prove certain statements, including such matters as deductive and inductive reasoning. We shall mostly ignore this aspect of philosophy when we are exploring Gor except in as so much that we shall rely on logic when making our points.
Metaphysics concerns explanations about the general aspects of reality such as the nature of our minds, bodies, God, space, time, the world and universe. We shall explore this topic as it applies to Gor, especially concerning the fabricated metaphysics imposed upon the Low Castes, also known as the Double Knowledge. We will also explore how different Gorean cultures, the barbarian peoples, have their own metaphysical beliefs.
Epistemology concerns the nature and extent of human knowledge, asking why we believe what we believe and whether true knowledge is possible. We shall explore this aspect as well as it applies to Gorean philosophy. Though some cultures may differ in this respect as well, there is more commonality here than in the area of metaphysics. Ethics concerns the proper way to conduct one’s life and issues of morality. We shall spend the most time discussing this subject as it applies to Gorean philosophy. When people generally refer to the Gorean philosophy, this is the topic they mean. They are most concerned about how to properly live according to this philosophy.
There are also derivative forms of philosophy, subjects that are more specific in nature such as political philosophy and aesthetics. It has even spread in modern times to cover such areas as the philosophy of sports, sex, health, business and many more. We may touch on a few of these derivative forms where they are applicable to Gor. For example, we shall examine some aspects of political philosophy such as the relation of Plato’s “The Republic” to the structure of the Gorean city. We may even touch upon some aspects of aesthetics as beauty is very important on Gor.
Let’s now define “Gorean,” an often controversial term online. There is often debate and disagreement on defining this term and many people have their own definitions of such. My definition is intended to be limited to the context of “Gorean philosophy.” I intend “Gorean” to be an expansive term, encompassing nearly all of the societies and cultures of Gor, from the cities such as Ar and Ko-ro-ba, to the barbarian lands of Torvaldsland and the Barrens. What unites these disparate peoples is an underlying set of philosophical principles.
This is what makes those people Gorean “by nature” as opposed to Gorean simply by their place of birth. Though their societal and cultural institutions vary, often quite significantly, these peoples are still united philosophically in many ways. Their metaphysics may vary, as well as their epistemology, but the foundation of their ethics is the same. And it is the ethical aspects that are of the greatest importance to those who wish to live by a Gorean philosophy. A few Gorean societies and cultures may try to repudiate these principles but they are not the norm. They are rare exceptions, such as the Panther Girls, who are unwilling to accept all of the principles, though very often they succumb to them in the end.
So, essentially this series will cover the commonalities and differences in three philosophic aspects among the disparate peoples of Gor. Metaphysics and epistemology will be dealt with briefly as they are of lesser importance to our interests and objectives. The area of ethics though will be central to our discussions. We shall also cover a number of other philosophically related matters. The primary objective of this series will be to help people understand the underlying principles of the Gorean philosophy, that apply to nearly all the peoples of Gor, and how they can impact upon societal and cultural institutions. We shall also better comprehend how a Gorean philosophy can be adopted and followed in our own lives.
Though understanding the Gorean philosophy, once it is presented, should not prove too difficult, enacting its principles in one’s life can be more problematic. This is because many of the philosophical principles of Gor are antithetical to the standards we are used to on Earth. We have been socially and culturally conditioned against these natural principles. And such conditioning can be very difficult to overcome. It is not an easy matter to cast it off and to embrace a philosophy so counter to it. It takes a massive effort of will, a true test of self-discipline and self-examination. Not everyone can or is willing to do this. But it can be done. Living according to a Gorean philosophy is a definite possibility.
There is a popular quote from the books that is often quoted as a proposition of how to live one’s life in a Gorean manner.
“Do not ask the stones or the trees how to live; they cannot tell you; they do not have tongues; do not ask the wise man how to live, for, if he knows, he will know he cannot tell you; if you would learn how to live do not ask the question, its answer is not in the question but in the answer, which is not in words, do not ask how to live, but instead proceed to do so.”
Marauders of Gor, p.9
Though this is a fine quote, its applicability to those on Earth is very limited. Its primary applicability is to the Goreans of the books who have been raised since birth to believe and understand the basic philosophy of Gor. It thus comes naturally to them and they do not need to engage in lengthy meditations over their philosophic choices.
We on Earth, due to the strong societal and cultural conditioning we receive since birth, cannot simply “just live” as Goreans do. We have forgotten how to do so. We must awaken to the realities of nature and that requires intensive self-examination to overcome our life-long conditioning. We must ask the stones and trees how to live. Thus, we must make take an active role to study and understand the Gorean philosophy. We would be much better off following the advice of Socrates: “The unexamined life is not worth living.”
If the Gorean philosophy is a positive philosophy, which I believe it to be, then it seems obvious that it should be promoted and encouraged. What reason is there not to promote a positive philosophy? In the Gorean books, Norman holds out a slim chance that those of Earth will one day “awaken” to the natural truths of the Gorean philosophy. He does not indicate that only a select few should follow the philosophy. It seems evident that he feels the entire planet could benefit from such a philosophy. He hopes for a future that has regained a connection to the natural world.
Thus, it makes sense to promote such a philosophy, to encourage people to learn and understand it. Turning people away from such a philosophy does a disservice to our society. Maybe the information presented here might help even a few comprehend the philosophy and choose to follow it in their lives.
Finally, I cannot stress enough that all education about Gor, including the philosophy, begins with the Gor books. If you wish to properly understand Gor, you must read the Gor books. There is no real substitute. Reading websites and message boards is insufficient for a proper understanding of Gor. They may help you better understand what you have read, but you should have the foundation of having read the books first.
Otherwise, you will be unable to discern the errors from the truth. And numerous websites do contain inaccuracies concerning the books. Without the books, you might be able to acquire a passing knowledge of Gor, but true comprehension will likely elude you. And if one truly cares about Gor, enough to want to live according to its philosophy, then reading the books should be a given.
“…love of learning, which can be one of the deepest and most honest of loves.”
Tarnsman of Gor, p.38
Written by Ubar Luther in Gor-Now.net
Posted on 2020-05-18 by Azrael Phoenix
“The right to search for the truth implies also a duty; one must not conceal any part of what one has recognized to be true.”
Albert Einstein
We have previously discussed two of the three primary elements of Gorean philosophy: metaphysics and epistemology. It is now time to begin our discussion and analysis of the final element of Gorean philosophy, ethics. This discussion will stretch out over numerous essays as it is an involved subject and of the greatest relevance to those who desire to live by a Gorean philosophy. It is also an area that has garnered the most online interest concerning Gorean philosophical thought, though it most often is not labeled as ethics in those discussions. It generally receives no label at all. Few people online discuss issues of Gorean metaphysics and epistemology for ethics is of far greater concern to them. They are more concerned about ethics in large part because it seems far more practical than metaphysics and epistemology.
Ethics deals with the proper way to conduct one’s life. It deals with issues of morality, values, right actions, the nature of good and much more. Ethics has been a major concern for philosophers since the ancient Greeks yet the underlying issues have been a part of mankind far longer than even that. Man, since he began to live in communities, has always been concerned about issues of right and wrong behavior. Their thoughts may have been very simple but their concerns were important to them.
Greek philosophers began to more systematically examine the primary issues of ethics, to delve into its intricacies. Socrates spent his entire life searching for the answer of how he should properly conduct his life. That was the intended purpose of his elenchus, the questioning and testing he would subject certain individuals to. The elenchus is more commonly known as the Socratic method. Plato’s Socratic dialogues commonly center on an example of the elenchus intended to assist in defining key ethical concepts. For example, Plato’s The Republic centers on the definition of justice. And Plato’s student, Aristotle, wrote extensively on ethics.
More modern philosophers continue to seek answers to these same questions and many of their answers vary significantly from those of the ancient Greeks. Ethics remains an area of controversy and modern technology has brought about new ethical concerns, issues that ancient man never had to consider. Cloning, nuclear proliferation, and stem cell research are a few of these new areas that ancient man never had to contemplate. Yet there are also many common ethical concerns that both modern men and ancient men share. Despite these shared concerns, modern man more often views those ethical concerns from a different paradigm than ancient man. And the ethics of modern man are often viewed from a different paradigm than the ethics of Gor as well.
When people discuss a “Gorean lifestyle” they are actually describing a form of ethics, a way to conduct their life based on the philosophical principles of Gor. The only caveat is that a “Gorean lifestyle” often comprises more than just philosophical principles. It commonly includes the emulation of certain societal and cultural aspects of Gor as well. Such aspects might include institutions such as slavery, Free Companionship, the Home Stone and the Caste system.
These institutions are modified to conform to the realities of our lives. But, these aspects are unnecessary to someone who wishes to follow only the philosophical principles of Gor. Those aspects are part of the fiction of Gor, even though they may derive from the philosophy. Many of those aspects are also generally limited on Gor to the cities of Gor. They are not universal institutions, followed by all of the diverse peoples of Gor. It would be more appropriate to label such institutions as “City Gorean” rather than the more general “Gorean.”
In many respects, Gorean ethics go backwards philosophically, embracing many of the tenets and beliefs of the ancient Greeks and Romans. Even when Gor seems to reflect the ideas of more modern day philosophers, still you will often find a strong connection to the ancient Greeks and Romans. For example, within the philosophy of Nietzsche, a German philosopher of the late 19th century, one will find many correlations to Gorean philosophy. Yet the philosophy of ancient Greece and Rome permeates Nietzschian philosophy. For example, Nietzsche often lauds such ancient philosophers as Heraclitus and Socrates. Other Nietzschean ideas clearly reflect the beliefs of the Hellenistic Stoics.
But, you will be unlikely to find many other more modern philosophers who would reflect Gorean ethics. For example, Gorean ethics do not reflect the utilitarianism of Bentham or the categorical imperatives of Kant. They reflect a different perspective, one that has begun recently to return again to the modern mindset. Some present-day philosophers are once again looking to the ethics of the ancient world for answers. They have become dissatisfied with the answers provided by modern philosophy and are seeking alternatives. And it is to there where we will find many of our own answers concerning Gorean ethics.
As discussed in the earlier essay on epistemology, our search for the truth will often take us outside of the Gorean books. Norman is a philosophy professor so he was clearly cognizant of the ideas of the ancient philosophers. And it seems readily apparent that these ancient philosophies served as a major inspiration for the world of Gor.
Thus, to better understand Gorean ethics, one’s reading should extend further than just the Gorean books. Such readings should seek out these inspirations for Gorean philosophy and ethics. Such readings will provide a deeper comprehension of the philosophical issues raised within the Gorean novels. Read about such philosophical groups as the Pythagoreans, Cynics, Epicureans, and Stoics. Read the works of such philosophers as Plato, Heraclitus, Seneca, Epictetus and Aristotle. Read specific works such as Plato’s The Republic, The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius and Aristotle’s Politics. Read about such important terms as the elenchus, arte, logos and eudaimonia. Read texts concerning virtue ethics and agent-centered morality. Read not only the actual works of the ancient philosophers but also books which explain and give commentary on the works of these ancient writers. Read some general histories of ancient philosophical thought.
As for more modern sources, I would also recommend the works of Nietzsche, a controversial German philosopher, especially his books Beyond Good and Evil and Genealogy of Morals. His works often reflect ancient Greek and Roman philosophy, placing it in a more modern setting. In fact, Nietzsche has even written books and essays on the ancient Greek philosophers.
Nietzsche is not an easy read though so it is advised to accompany your reading of his works with readings of explanatory works by other writers and philosophers. It helps immensely when trying to understand Nietzsche to see the entire picture rather than to dwell on individual quotes and books. Nietzsche is best examined as a whole and not by any individual work. His works can be easily misunderstood. His works can also be easily twisted by those who choose to take a few quotes out of context to denigrate Nietzsche.
As many Gorean philosophical principles are based on natural principles, then one can also benefit from readings into the field of evolutionary psychology, also known as sociobiology. That is a field that touches on genetics, biology, psychology, ethics and more. It is a field where much confusion and controversy still reigns though much of the criticisms of the field are unfounded. Some recommended books in that area include: Sociobiology: The New Synthesis by E.O. Wilson, The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins, The Triumph of Sociobiology by John Alcock, Defenders of the Truth by Ullica Segerstrale and The Moral Animal by Robert Wright.
When we begin to examine Gorean ethics, we are presented with a broad spectrum of different aspects. We have the underlying philosophical principles that form the foundation of Gorean philosophy and we also have the morality of Gor, which can be basically summarized as virtue ethics. The distinction between these two aspects is often not made clear online. Some tend to mix the two or ignore one for the other. Yet both aspects are very significant.
In addition, there are extensions of Gorean ethics as well, areas that present their own individual philosophies such as the political philosophy of Gor. This series of essays will attempt to delve into all of these different aspects, to highlight the important elements of each. Some of these aspects have rarely been discussed before, if ever, yet they are important topics that deserve discussion and analysis.
How do you encapsulate Gorean philosophy into a single sentence?
How do you narrow down the multitude of philosophical principles of Gor into one easily understood statement?
How do you describe the underlying foundation of Gorean philosophy to someone who has no knowledge of Gor?
Can it even be done?
After a careful reading of the Gorean books, it is evident that it can be done. While reading and examining the Gorean series, there is one primary principle that leaps out at us time and time again. We can see its traces through out all of the books, its tendrils touching upon so many different aspects of Gor. We can see it reach into the civilized cities of Gor as well as the diverse barbarian cultures.
Essentially, this principle is followed by nearly every Gorean on the planet. This near universal following makes this principle inherently “Gorean.” It is not a principle restricted by geographic region, socio-economic status, or level of civilization. It is a principle that binds all of the peoples of Gor. Without this principle, Gor would not be Gor.
This basic principle is very simple to express, five ordinary words that form one ordinary sentence. Yet the philosophical implications of that ordinary sentence are most profound. It is a sentence pregnant with meaning, swollen with complexity. It is a principle that has existed on Earth since the days of antiquity yet has been largely forgotten in our modern, mechanistic society. Modern society has chosen to ignore this principle and suffered due to its absence. The technological concerns of modern man have separated him from this principle, to his detriment. In fact, modern society has chosen to operate on a principle in clear opposition to this basic Gorean principle. Yet, this principle is the single most important aspect of Gorean philosophy.
Live In Accordance With Nature
It is as simple as that, and as complex as well. In many ways, the entire Gorean series is an attempt to define this underlying principle, to determine the parameters of this important foundation of Gor. There are numerous other philosophical principles within the novels but they only serve as definitional principles to this foundational one. There is a symbiotic relationship between this basic principle and its definitional principles.
Each needs each other to be fully complete. They can try to stand alone but then must navigate through a mire of ambiguity. And that ambiguity threatens the validity of each separate component. Yet when they are properly fitted together, the ambiguity must then battle for its own survival. Clarity accompanies a more complete definition and provides a more substantial framework for the Gorean philosophy.
There is no more basic Gorean principle that this one. Every other philosophical principle that can be found within the Gor books ultimately derives from this basic principle. Each of these definitional principles serves to clarify and define the primary principle. Some of these definitional principles are quite explicit in the books while others are more hidden, concealed deeper within the fiction. In addition, more definitional principles might be revealed in later books.
There is no guarantee that this most basic principle has been completely defined so far. It does seem evident that the definition has a strong foundation but we cannot ignore the possibility that some aspect may be missing. It does seem likely though that any subsequently revealed definitional principle will not radically change our current understanding of this principle. They would simply add an additional nuance to our comprehension.
This foundational principle is echoed by a number of ancient philosophers, most especially the Hellenistic Stoics. But, if we carefully examine the philosophy of the Stoics, their own derivatives and definitions of this basic principle, we can discern some significant differences from the Gorean philosophy. Thus, even though both start from the same foundational principle, how they define the parameters of that principle can vary, sometimes very substantially.
This points out an important issue for those who will do additional reading concerning ancient philosophies. Even though Norman borrowed extensively from these philosophies for Gor, he also made certain changes to conform to the vision he possessed of Gor. So the reader must be wary of differentiating the similarities and differences between Gorean philosophy and ancient philosophies.
(As an additional example, we can note that Aristotle conceived of a natural theory of slavery. Yet his own theory varies significantly from the Gorean natural theory of slavery. Aristotle felt that both men and women could be natural slaves. Norman stated that only women were natural slaves. Men might be enslaved on Gor but it was not a natural occurrence, it was more an economic issue. Aristotle also believed that natural slaves were deficient in reason, mentally inferior. Norman did not feel that natural slaves were such. In fact, Norman felt that a slave could be extremely intelligent and still be a natural slave. Many Goreans value intelligence in their slaves.)
Let us first break down our foundational principle into its basic components, to achieve a starting definition from which we can build upon. First, we have “Live.” We are being advised on a course of action, on what we should do and how to conduct our life. The sentence is phrased more as an imperative, a command for our conduct. Next, we have “In Accordance.” This entails a relationship, one conducive to harmony, one that follows the dictates of some source. It avoids conflict, seeking a balance.
Finally, we have “With Nature.” This is the source, that with which we must harmonize our lives. Nature also adopts a dual role, covering both the natural world around us as well as our own inner natures. Thus, this principle could actually be broken down into two separate, but interconnected, components: “Live In Accordance With The Natural World” & ”Live In Accordance With Our Inner Nature.”
If this principle is the key to Gorean philosophy, is it thus sufficient to follow only this principle in one’s life to live according to a Gorean philosophy? The short and simple answer is “yes.” This principle is the essential key but the answer is not quite as simple as that. For one must also properly understand this principle, to know its parameters and definitional principles.
As was mentioned previously, the Stoics held to this exact same principle yet their philosophy is very different in many respects from Gorean philosophy. So, two people could follow this same basic principle but that would not guarantee that each of them was following a Gorean philosophy. Thus, though you need only follow this principle to follow a Gorean philosophy, you cannot do so unless you fully comprehend how Goreans define this principle.
Let’s consider an analogy, comparing and contrasting the Gorean Warrior Caste and the Japanese samurai. A foundational principle to both groups would be “Be honorable and follow the warrior code of conduct.” But, each of these two groups has a different code of conduct so what might be honorable to a samurai might be dishonorable to a Gorean Warrior.
For example, suicide can be honorable, under the proper circumstances, to a samurai but it is always dishonorable to a Gorean Warrior. Thus, simply being honorable and following a warrior code of conduct will not necessarily make one either a Gorean Warrior or a samurai. You must delve deeper to assess the definitional principles beneath the foundational principle.
For the foundational principle to be truly Gorean in nature, then you must accept the definitions provided within the books, the parameters set forth in the series. If you try to define this principle on your own, it will no longer be Gorean. It may still be a valid philosophy but it will not be Gorean. We must then carefully examine the Gorean series to learn how to properly define this basic principle.
Thus, understanding the existence of this basic principle is only the start of one’s exploration of Gorean philosophy. A further exploration requires a reading and analysis of the entire Gorean series, to scrutinize the works to locate those definitional parameters for this foundational principle of Gor. It will also require outside reading to understand all of these additional principles and concepts.
So, what are some of the definitional principles of Gor, those principles that help to define the basic philosophical stance of “Live in Accordance with Nature?” They include such matters, in no particular order, as:
(These and additional definitional principles will be more fully discussed in later essays.)
In we examine these definitional principles, we will again see that they apply to not only the peoples of the cities of Gor but also the peoples of the barbarian lands. Thus, these principles are near universal across Gor, as is the foundational principle we first examined. If a principle only applied in the cities, or just in the barbarian lands, then it would not be “Gorean” in the sense of being a defining aspect of nearly any inhabitant of the planet of Gor.
Such principles would need qualification such as being a “City Gorean” or “Barbarian Gorean” one. As an example, the Home Stone is a societal institution generally restricted to the cities of Gor. The barbarian lands do not possess Home Stones. Thus, in the broader sense, a Home Stone is not a “Gorean” matter but is more appropriately a “City Gorean” one.
The definitional principles also form the underlying basis for the varied societal and cultural institutions on Gor. The obvious diversity of these institutions on Gor indicates the flexibility of these principles. There is no single set of institutions that must necessarily derive from these definitional principles.
For example, the Caste system of the cities of Gor, based in part on Nature being hierarchical, is not essential to the definitional principles of Gor. The barbarian lands do not possess a Caste system yet they follow that same definitional principle. The Wagon Peoples have a clan system that follows that principle but their system is very different from the Caste system of the cities. Other barbarian peoples have their own ways of arranging a hierarchy of their peoples.
In general, the people of Gor do not sit and ponder these definitional principles. These principles are so ingrained into their society and culture that they are second nature. Their cultural and societal institutions have a lengthy tradition and they go unquestioned. And in general, people do not contest these principles.
Those that do are generally outcasts, such as the Panther Girls and talunas who object to the prevalence of male dominance. Yet they are but a tiny minority on Gor. These principles have worked for centuries for Goreans so they see no reason to alter their perceptions. Tradition maintains a powerful hold over Gorean life.
The books provide an interesting quote on the Gorean stance to ethics.
Do not ask the stones or the trees how to live; they cannot tell you; they do not have tongues; do not ask the wise man how to live, for, if he knows, he will know he cannot tell you; if you would learn how to live do not ask the question, its answer is not in the question but in the answer, which is not in words, do not ask how to live, but instead proceed to do so.
Marauders of Gor, p.9
This quote is sometimes used to indicate that Gorean philosophy is something that is learned only through living and not study. Such individuals see little reason to engage in philosophical discourse. To them, Gorean ethics is naturally evident. Yet, is this actually the case? Can we just live as the Goreans do?
If we were raised on Gor, then we would not need to study Gorean philosophical principles. We would have been raised according to those principles, taught to embrace them from our youth. Our entire society would be based upon those principles. These principles would be naturally evident to us. We would generally see no other viewpoint. But, those of us raised on Earth come from a radically different background. We are not raised according to these principles.
Much of our society is based on opposite principles. The only way we even learn of these other principles is through reading and studying. We cannot just live as Goreans do because we have forgotten how to do so. We have discarded the natural principles embraced on Gor. We must actively overcome societal conditioning to embrace these natural principles. And that takes true study and effort. We must ask how to live because we no longer know how to do so. The above-cited quote is appropriate for those of Gor but not for those of Earth.
So, we have begun our journey down the path of Gorean ethics. It is a long road, with many side roads to explore. Some of the road will seem familiar while other sections will seem very new. We hope that it will be an interesting and educational trek through this philosophical landscape.
Written by Ubar Luther in Gor-Now.net
Posted on 2020-05-17 by Azrael Phoenix
This is part of the work on the Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer
8) Gorean Beliefs and a Definition of the Gorean Character – Conclusion
Summary of the selected quotations:
Goreans believe it is healthy to openly express their emotions. They believe that any city, built by human hands, is a living amalgamation of those who have built it, and reside there. They are proud of their cities and display their civil affiliations openly. They take great care and pride in what they make, and construct. They feel that pitying another person is humiliating, whereas loving them is not. Goreans have little sensitivity to matters of race, but much to language and city. While strict, they are seldom sadistic or cruel. Outwardly they seem to think little of women, in some ways, but make a point of extravagantly celebrating them in other ways. The average Gorean is somewhat impatient and light-hearted, enjoying the joys of life somewhat more than its duties of drudgery.
The Gorean feels compelled to challenge himself against what is beautiful and dangerous. Gorean women express vitality, and carry themselves with an upright posture, indicating their appreciation for grace and beauty. Goreans are fond of gambling, and of taking risks. Gorean women understand submission behaviours and the particulars of slavery as practiced on their world, and understand and accept the reality of its existence in relation to themselves.
Goreans are not fond of beggars or panhandlers. They are extremely sensitive about names, and who has the right to speak to them. Goreans celebrate and value high intelligence in women.
Goreans believe that in every woman there is an inner competition between the desire to be free and the desire to be owned by her man. They believe that any woman can be forced to submit– yet they celebrate those women who are capable of making the necessary sacrifices required for them to maintain their freedom and independence within the boundaries of Gorean society.
Gorean morality encourages honour, courage, hardness and strength. Goreans render their enemies the respect which is rightfully due to them. They refuse to divide or cripple themselves in opposition to nature. They see no reason why all who are male should not embrace their maleness and be men. The Gorean worldview is one of honesty and vitality, devoted to the joy of being alive. A Goreans’ caste, i.e. his career and its supporting industry, is a large part of his personal identity.
Goreans commonly exhibit good taste and aesthetic good sense. They are highly attuned to beauty when they encounter it. They appraise their women openly and without artifice. They feel that the rights and benefits of citizenship, like all things of worth, should be actively earned. The Gorean experiences life in an intense and personal way. He loves his world, and does not wish to do it harm, or see it destroyed. Honour is important to him. In some ways he is seen as cruel, but he does not lie or make excuses. Goreans are fond of children, and take pains to care for them. When Goreans discriminate against others, rather than due to race, they tend to do so based upon the city which one claims, their misuse of his language, or their caste… yet on the average they value all castes, and the work done by all.
Goreans are not tolerant of pretence. They insist upon having their own way, and experiencing their women to the ultimate degree possible. The Gorean refuses to accept that civilization must be based upon the denial of nature. Goreans do not celebrate sexual naivete or sexual repression.
Gorean men do not move, and think, in herds. They are highly individualistic. They value masculinity in men, and femininity in women, and refuse to repress either. The Gorean mindset is one of ambition, and freshness, and hope.
The Gorean measures his world from the inside outward, starting at what he can personally own and control. When Goreans are cruel, is it for a particular purpose. Goreans do not embrace the concept of modern, wholescale warfare on a continental scale, either in theory or in practice.
Gorean men are not patient with male slaves who willingly serve the whims of women.
Caste membership, as it exists to him, is indicative not only of career but of family trade.
Goreans believe that the welfare of the many is more important than the welfare of the few.
Many Gorean women are haughty and proud, some even to the point of veiling themselves from the prying eyes of the unworthy. Goreans value worthy free women greatly, and will honour them for it, by such actions as rising when they enter a room.
Goreans refuse to inhibit the sexuality of women who have embraced their slave-nature. Goreans do not celebrate sexual naivete. Rather, they appreciate sexual maturity and experience.
Goreans do not support the denial of anything’s true nature, nor do they long tolerate such repression when it appears before them. Goreans believe it is morally wrong to enslave what must, by its nature, be free to exist.
Goreans do not support the adoption of male insignia or customs by women, or vice versa. They see this as an attempt at gender unification, which lessens and degrades both sexes.
In women, Goreans celebrate their need for love, and the depth of their ability to express such love.
Even Gorean games, taught to Gorean youth, are such that they encourage courage, discipline, honour, and audacity.
Goreans do not appreciate any attempt to mess with their honour. Goreans disdain physical insecurities about their bodies, and stand close to one another in one-on-one interaction. Goreans are practical in areas of romance, and do not subscribe to fairy-tale notions of the relationship between men and women.
Gorean men are strong, powerful, uninhibited and uncompromising. They are proud of the fact that they are men. They refuse to be dictated to by their women.
Gorean artisans and craftsmen feel that they are simply the vessel through which their art flows, and are not overly vain about their abilities and talents.
Goreans believe in the value of order. They do not subscribe to anarchy. Goreans don’t understand why anyone would want to prevent another from being what they were created by nature to be. The Gorean believes that the world and all things in it are a living, breathing biological system of which he is a part, and does not subscribe to the belief that he is above it, or outside of it. He understands that he, too, is subject to nature and its forces.
A Gorean takes honour and truth very seriously. He can sometimes be fooled, or hoaxed, by those less honourable than himself… but he learns fast. He will not long tolerate being lied to.
That, in my opinion, pretty much says it all.
I add only the following:
I have been told that Norman’s work supports totalitarianism, and mass conformity beneath the heel of tyrants.
The following words are Norman’s. Is this man extolling the virtues of conformity?
“All creatures are not the same, not is it necessary that they should be. Jungles may be as appealing to nature as gardens. Leopards and wolves are as legitimately ingredient in the order of nature as spaniels and potatoes. Species unification, I suspected, would prove not to be a blessing, but a trap and a bane, a pathology and curse, a societal sanatorium in which the great and strong would be reduced to, or must pretend to be reduced to, the level of the blinking, the cringing, the creeping and the tiny. To be sure, values are involved here, and one must make decisions. It is natural that the small and weak will make one decision, and the large and strong another. There is no single humanity, no single shirt, no correct pair of shoes, no uniform, even a grey one, that will fit all men. There are a thousand humanities possible. He who denies this sees only his own horizons. He who disagrees is the denier of difference, and the murderer of better futures.”
pg.31, Savages of Gor
I have also been told that Norman must be a misogynist, and obviously hated all women.
Are these the words of a misogynist?
“Human females are such rich and wonderful creatures. Their sexual life, and feelings, are subtle, complex and deep. How naive is the man who believes that having sex with a woman is so little or so brief a thing as to fall within the parameters of a horizontal plane, the simple stimulations of a skin, the results attendant upon a simplistic manual dexterity. How woefully ignorant are the engineers of sexuality. How much to learn have even her artists and poets! Women are so inordinately precious. They are so sensitive, so beautiful, so intelligent and needful. No man has yet counted the dimensions of a woman’s love. Who can measure the horizons of her heart? Few things, I suspect, are more real than those which seem most intangible.”
pg.181-182, Blood Brothers of Gor
Again, I say it to any who might be reading this, who insist upon misinterpreting all that we say here, or who vehemently decry all we say without having the slightest understanding of what we are actually saying, or why we are saying it:
READ THE DAMN BOOKS.
ALL OF THEM.
Then, make whatever judgement seems good to you.
To do less is to do a disservice to their author, and is an exercise in wilful intellectual dishonesty.
Truth not won is not possessed. We are not entitled to truths for which we have not fought, or for which we have not expended the effort to ascertain their possible validity by at least CONSIDERING them.
That is a Gorean Maxim.
I wish you well,
_Marcus_
Back to The Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer Index
Copyright © 2006, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996. Marcus of Ar. All rights reserved.
©2020 by Azrael Phoenix
Posted on 2020-05-17 by Azrael Phoenix
This is part of the work on the Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer
8) Gorean Beliefs and a Definition of the Gorean Character – Introduction
What is the definitive source for what makes a person Gorean?
The definitive source?
I would think that the DEFINITIVE source would be John Norman, who, after all, created the world of Gor in the first place. Yes?
So… let’s go for that definitive answer. Or at least, the one which makes the most sense since it comes straight from the Gor books themselves.
If anyone examines the quotes below, all of which SPECIFICALLY allude to what Goreans believe (according to Norman), what Goreans do (according to Norman), or what Goreans are (according to Norman), and STILL refutes the author’s own definition of what is, and isn’t, Gorean, well, then, there’s not much I can do about that.
The evidence is there. Straight from the source of the whole thing, defined by its inventor.
To deny it is not only illogical, but, in a certain sense, somewhat deluded.
So… here we go. The following selection of quotes is made up of excerpts from the Gor books in which Norman either directly says “Goreans are…” or “Most Goreans believe…”, or whatever. Or those in which he compares and contrasts Earth beliefs against common Gorean ones, or in which he illustrates the reasons behind Gorean cultural mores and philosophical beliefs. They are presented in the same order as they appeared in the books, with included page numbers for reference or to enable a reader to research them further for context.
“We met in the centre of the room and embraced. I wept, and he did, too, without shame. I learned later that on this alien world a strongman may feel and express emotions, and that the hypocrisy of constraint is not honoured on this planet as it is on mine.”
pg.25, Tarnsman of Gor
“For the Gorean, though he seldom speaks of these things, a city is more than brick and marble, cylinders and bridges. It is not simply a place, a geographical location in which men have seen fit to build their dwellings, a collection of structures where they may conveniently conduct their affairs. The Gorean senses, or believes, that a city cannot be simply identified with its material elements, which undergo their transformations even as do the cells of a human body. For them a city is almost a living thing, or more than a living thing. It is an entity with a history, as stones and rivers do not have history; it is an entity with a tradition, a heritage, customs, practices, character, intentions, hopes. When a Gorean says, for example, that he is of Ar, or Ko-ro-ba, he is doing a great deal more than informing you of his place of residence. The Goreans, generally, though there are exceptions, particularly the Caste of Initiates, do not believe in immortality. Accordingly, to be of a city is, in a sense, to have been a part of something less perishable than oneself, something divine in the sense of undying. Of course, as every Gorean knows, cities too are mortal, for cities can be destroyed as well as men. And this perhaps makes them love their cities the more, for they know that their city, like themselves, is subject to mortal termination.”
pg.22, Outlaw of Gor
“I was puzzled that the garb, like the helmet and shield, bore no insignia. This was contrary to the ways of Gor, for normally only the habiliments of outlaws and exiles, men without a city, lack the identifying devices of which the Gorean is so proud.”
pg.24, Outlaw of Gor
“The Gorean, having little idea of progress in our sense, takes great care in building and workmanship. What he builds he expects men to use until the storms of time have worn it to dust.”
pg.25, Outlaw of Gor
“According to the Gorean way of thinking pity humiliates both he who pities and he who is pitied. According to the Gorean way, one may love but one may not pity.”
pg. 31, Outlaw of Gor
“Unlike the men of Earth, the Gorean has little sensitivity to race, but much to language and city.”
pg.48, Outlaw of Gor
“The Gorean is suspicious of the stranger, particularly in the vicinity of his native walls.”
pg. 49, Outlaw of Gor
“Perhaps it should only be added that the Gorean master, though often strict, is seldom cruel. The girl knows, if she pleases him, her lot will be an easy one. She will almost never encounter sadism or wanton cruelty, for the psychological environment that tends to breed these diseases is largely absent on Gor.”
pg. 53-54, Outlaw of Gor
“Paradoxically, the Gorean, who seems to think so little of women in some respects, celebrates them extravagantly in others. The Gorean is extremely sensitive to beauty; it gladdens his heart, and his songs and art are often paeans to its glory.”
pg. 54, Outlaw of Gor
“…I was confident they [the downtrodden men of Tharna] could accomplish what they set their minds to, that they might succeed in tasks which the average Gorean male, with his impatience and lightness of heart, would simply abandon as distasteful or not worth the effort, for the average Gorean male, it must be admitted, tends to regard the joys of life somewhat more highly than its duties.”
pg.65, Outlaw of Gor
“I once asked a Gorean hunter whom I had met in Ar why the larl was hunted at all. I have never forgotten his reply. `Because it is beautiful,’ he said, `and dangerous, and because we are Goreans.’”
pg.20, Priest-Kings of Gor
“In all these kneeling positions, incidentally, even that of the Pleasure Slave, the Gorean woman carries herself well; her back is straight and her chin is high. She tends to be vital and beautiful to look upon.”
pg.46-47, Priest Kings of Gor
“The Tuchuks, not unlike Goreans in general, are fond of gambling.”
pg.60, Nomads of Gor
“The Gorean girl is, even if free, accustomed to slavery; she will perhaps own one or more slaves herself; she knows that she is weaker than men and what this can mean; she knows that cities fall and caravans are plundered; she knows she might even, by a sufficiently bold warrior, be captured in her own quarters and, bound and hooded, be carried by tarnback over the wall of her own city.”
pg.63, Nomads of Gor
“Aphris of Turia, pleased with herself, assumed her place between the merchant and Kamchak, kneeling back on her heels in the position of the Gorean Free Woman. Her back was very straight and her head high, in the Gorean fashion.”
pg.94, Nomads of Gor
“Goreans do not generally favor begging, and some regard it as na insult that there should be such, an insult to them and their city.”
pg.12, Assassin of Gor
“Goreans are extremely sensitive about names, and who may speak them.”
pg.12, Assassin of Gor
“I supposed the requirements of the slaves were high. Each of the girls, I suspected, would be vital and much alive. Each of them I knew was beautiful. Each of them I suspected would be intelligent, for Goreans, as the men of Earth commonly do not, celebrate quickness of mind and alertness in a girl.”
pg.125, Assassin of Gor
“The Goreans claim that in each woman there is a free companion, proud and beautiful, worthy and noble, and in each, too, a slave girl. The companion seeks for her companion; the slave girl for her master. It is further said, that on the couch, the Gorean girl, whether slave or free, who has had the experience, who has tried all loves, begs for a master. She wishes to belong completely to a man, withholding nothing, permitted to withhold nothing. ”
pg.102, Hunters of Gor
“Goreans, in their simplistic fashion, often contend, categorically, that man is naturally free and woman is naturally slave. But even for them the issues are far more complex than these simple formulations would suggest. For example, there is no higher person, nor one more respected, than the Gorean free woman… Goreans do believe, however, that every woman has a natural master or set of masters, with respect to whom she could not help but be a complete and passionate slave girl. These men occur in her dreams and fantasies. She lives in terror that she might meet one in real life.”
p.311, Hunters of Gor
“The Morality of Earth, from the Gorean point of view, is a morality which would be viewed as more appropriate to slaves that free men. It would be seen in terms of the envy and resentment of inferiors for their superiors. It lays great stress on equalities and being humble and being pleasant and avoiding friction and being ingratiating and small. It is a morality in the best interest of slaves, who would be only too eager to be regarded as the equals of others. We are all the same. That is the hope of slaves; that is what it is in their interest to convince others of. The Gorean morality on the other hand is more one if inequalities, based on the assumption that individuals are not the same, but quite different in many ways. It might be said to be, though this is over simple, a morality of masters. Guilt is almost unknown in Gorean morality, though shame and anger are not. Many Earth moralities encourage resignation and accommodation; Gorean morality is bent more toward conquest and defiance; many Earth moralities encourage tenderness, pity and gentleness, sweetness; Gorean morality encourages honour, courage, hardness and strength. To Gorean morality many Earth moralities might ask, `Why so hard?’ To these earth moralities, The Gorean ethos might ask, `Why so soft?’”
pg.8, Marauders of Gor
“Gorean enemies, if skilled, often hold one another in high regard.”
pg.70, Marauders of Gor
“I suddenly realized the supreme power of the united Gorean will, not divided against itself, not weak, not crippled like the wills of Earth. I felt a surge of power, of unprecedented, unexpected joy. I had discovered what it was to be Gorean. I had discovered what is was, truly, to be male, to be a man. I was Gorean.”
pg.290, Marauders of Gor
“`On Earth,’ I said, `women try to be identical with men.’ `Why should that be?’ asked the man. `Perhaps because there are few men,’ I said. `The male population is small?’ he asked. `There are many males,’ I said, `but few men.’ `I find this hard to understand,’ said the slave master. I smiled. `The distinction,’ I said, `makes little sense to a Gorean.’”
p.76, Tribesmen of Gor
“There is perhaps little to be said for the Gorean world, but in it men and women are alive. It is a world which I would not willingly surrender. It is a very different world from mine; in its way, I suppose it is worse; in its way, I know it is better. It is its own place, and not another’s. It is honest and real. In it there is good air.”
p.212, Slave Girl of Gor
“Caste is important to Goreans in a way that is difficult for members of a non-caste society to understand. Though there are doubtless difficulties involved with caste structure the caste situation lends an individual identity and pride, allies him with thousands of caste brothers, and provides him with various opportunities and services.”
pg.213, Slave Girl of Gor
“Goreans commonly exhibit good taste and aesthetic sense. Indeed, good taste and aesthetic good sense, abundantly and amply displayed, harmoniously manifested, in such areas as language, architecture, dress, culture and customs, seem innately Gorean. It is a civilization informed by beauty, from the tanning and cut of a workman’s sandal to the glazing’s intermixed and fused, sensitive to light and shadow, and the time of the day, which characterize the lofty towers of her beautiful cities.”
pg.215, Slave Girl of Gor
“Gorean men have a way of looking at women which is like stripping them and putting them to their feet.”
pg. 267, Slave Girl of Gor
“The youth of Earth have no Home Stone. Citizenship, interestingly, in most Gorean cities is conferred only upon the coming of age, and only after certain examinations are passed. Further, the youth of Gor, in most cities, must be vouched for by citizens of the city, not related in blood to him, and be questioned before a committee of citizens, intent upon determining his worthiness or lack thereof to take the Home Stone of the city as his own. Citizenship in most Gorean communities is not something accrued in virtue of the accident of birth but earned in virtue of intent and application.”
pg. 394, Slave Girl of Gor
“The Gorean, in general, regards many things in a much more intense and personal way than, say, the informed man of Earth. Perhaps that is because he is the victim of a more primitive state of consciousness; perhaps, on the other hand, we have forgotten things which he has not. Perhaps the world speaks only to those who a reprepared to listen… The man of Earth thinks of the world as being essentially dead; the Gorean thinks of his world as being essentially alive… He cares for his world; it is his friend; he would not care to kill it.”
pg.29-30, Beasts of Gor
“Honour is important to Goreans, in a way that those of Earth might find it hard to understand; for example, those of Earth find it natural that men should go to war over matters of gold and riches, but not honour; the Gorean, contrariwise, is more willing to submit matters of honour to the adjudication of steel than he is matters of riches and gold; there is a simple explanation for this; honour is more important to him.”
pg.42, Beasts of Gor
“In some respects the Gorean are, perhaps, cruel. Yet they have never seen fit, through lies, to inflict suffering on children. They seem generally to me to be fond of children. Perhaps that is why they seldom hurt them. Even slave children, incidentally, are seldom abused or treated poorly, and are given much freedom, until they reach their young adulthood.”
pg.155, Beasts of Gor
“Race, incidentally, is not a serious matter generally for Goreans, perhaps because of the intermixtures of people. Language and city, and caste, however, are matters of great moment to them, and provide sufficient basis for the discriminations in which human beings take such great delight.”
pg.156, Beasts of Gor
“`Gorean men,’ I said, `you will learn, are less tolerant of pretense than the men of Earth.’”
pg.202, Beasts of Gor
“`Goreans are not men of Earth,’ I said. `They will have what they truly want from a woman, everything.’”
pg.230, Beasts of Gor
“Civilization may be predicated upon the denial of human nature; it may also be predicated upon its fulfilment. The first word that na Earth baby learns is usually, `No.’ The first word that a Gorean baby learns is commonly, `Yes.’ The machine and the flower, I suspect, will never understand one another.”
p.37, Explorers of Gor
“`Why is it,’ she asked, `that the men of Gor do not think and move in herds, like those of earth?’ `I do not know,” I said. Perhaps they are different. Perhaps the culture is different. Perhaps it has to do with the decentralization of city states, the multiplicity of tradition, the diversity of the caste codes.’ `I think the men of Gor are different,’ she said.
pg. 333-334, Explorers of Gor
“`On Gor,’ she said, `we would not even break our male slaves as the men of Earth are broken.’”
p.73, Fighting Slave of Gor
“I sensed that in Gor there was a youth and openness which had long been missing from my old world. In Gor I sensed an ambition, a freshness and hope, and sparkle, that had perhaps not been felt on Earth since the Parthenon was new. Doubtless there is much on Gor to be deplored, but I cannot bring myself to deplore it. Doubtless Goris impatient, cruel and heartless, but yet, I think, too, it is innocent. It is like the lion, impatient, cruel, heartless and innocent. It is its nature. Gor was a strong-thewed world, a new world, a world in which men might again lift their heads to the sun and laugh, a world in which they might again, sensibly, begin long journeys. It was a world of which Homer might have sung, singing of the clashing of the metals of men and the sweetness of the wine-dark sea.”
p.89, Fighting Slave of Gor
“I think the explanation for the Gorean political arrangements and attitudes is the institution of the Home Stone. It is the Home Stone which, for the Gorean, marks the centre. I think it is because of their Home Stones that the Gorean tends to think of territory as something from the inside out, so to speak, rather than from the outside in. Consider again the analogy of the circle. For the Gorean the Home Stone would mark the point of the circle’s centre. It is the Home Stone which, so to speak, determines the circle.”
pg.145, Fighting Slave of Gor
“Total warfare, with its arming of millions of men, and its broadcasts laughter of hundreds of populations, is Gorean neither in concept nor in practice. Goreans, often castigated for their cruelty, would find such monstrosities unthinkable. Cruelty on Gor, though it exists, is usually purposeful, as in attempting to bring, through discipline and privation, a young man to manhood, or in teaching a female that she is a slave.”
pg.145, Fighting Slave of Gor
“Gorean men, I had learned, are not patient with [male] silk slaves.”
pg.181, Fighting Slave of Gor
“Caste membership, for Goreans, is generally a simple matter of birth; it is not connected necessarily with the performance of certain skills, nor the attainment of a given level of proficiency in such skills.”
pg.209, Fighting Slave of Gor
“The welfare of a larger number of individuals, as the Goreans reason, correctly or incorrectly, is more important than the welfare of a smaller number of individuals.”
p.210, Fighting Slave of Gor
“Many Gorean women, in their haughtiness and pride, do not choose to have their features exposed to the common view.”
p.41, Rogue of Gor
“Goreans place few impediments in the way of the liberation of a slave female’s sexuality.”
p.186, Rogue of Gor
“`The brutes of Gor have their way with you, as it pleases them,’ I said, `and you serve them well. Do you think the men of Earth should be content with less?’ `No, Master,’ she whimpered. `If the men of Earth choose to surrender the birth right of their dominance, to exchange it for the garbage of a political perversion; if they should choose to deny their genes; if they should choose to subvert and violate the order of nature; if they should choose self-castration to manhood, that is, I suppose, their business.’ `I do not know, Master,’ she said. `Provided, of course, that they are willing to accept such penalties as anxiety, guilt, misery, frustration, sickness and shortened lifespans.’ `I do not know, Master,’ she said. `A subverted nature cannot be expected not to retaliate,’ I said. `No, Master,’ she said. `Does a man have a right to be a man?’ I asked. `I suppose so,’ she said. `I do not know.’ `And are there not hierarchies among rights, and some which take priority over others?’ `Be kind to me, Master,’ she begged. `And is not the right of a man to be a man the highest right of such a sort that man possesses?’ `Yes,’ she said. `What right takes precedence over that?’ I asked. `None, Master,’ she said. `Has man,’ I asked, `the right to bring about his own downfall, to destroy himself?’ `He has the capacity, Master,’ she whispered, `but I do not think he has that right.’ `He does not have that right,’ I told her, `for it conflicts with the higher right.’ `Yes, Master,’ she said. `Rather,’ said I, `he has, beyond rights, duties, and high among his duties is his duty to be true to himself, his duty to be a man.’ `Yes, Master,’ she said. `The denial of his manhood, then, by a man, is not only irrational, but morally pernicious. Men have not only a right to preserve their manhood, but a duty to do so.’ `Perhaps there is no such thing as manhood,’ she whispered, `or womanhood.’ `Tell that,’ I said, `to strong men and yielding women, and history.’ `Perhaps there are no such things as duties, and rights,’ she said, `perhaps there are only the words, used as the instruments of manipulative rhetoric’s, devices of conditioning, cheaper and more subtle than guns and whips.’ `That is an interesting and profound possibility,’ I said, `but then there would still remain needs and powers, forces and desires, and the facts of the world, that certain courses of action lead to certain results, and that other courses of action lead to other results. And in such a world who will argue with the larl as to whether or not it should feed, or with a man as to whether or not he should be a man? In such a world the larl hunts, and the man is a man.’”
pg.152-153, Guardsman of Gor
“The men rose as one to their feet, for Gorean men commonly stand when a free woman enters a room.”
pg.255, Guardsmen of Gor
“`To be sure,’ I said, `’ white’ in the context of ‘white-silk girl’[virginity] tends less to suggest purity and innocence to the Gorean than ignorance, naivety, and a lack of experience.”
p.205, Savages of Gor
“Musicians on Gor, that is, those of the Caste of Musicians, are seldom, if ever, enslaved. Their immunity from bondage, or practical immunity from bondage, is a matter of custom. There is a saying to the effect that those who make music must, like the tarn, and the vosk gull, be free.”
pg.297-298, Kajira of Gor
“The insignia of men, like male garments, become empty mockeries when permitted to women. This type of thing leads eventually both to demasculinization of men and the defeminisation of females, a perversion of nature disapproved of generally, correctly or incorrectly, by Goreans. ”
pg.56, Mercenaries of Gor
“The most fundamental property prized by Goreans in women, I suppose, though little is said about it, is her need for love, and her capacity for love.”
p.322, Mercenaries of Gor
“Many Gorean games, incidentally, have features which encourage the development of properties regarded as desirable in a Gorean youth, such as courage, discipline, and honour. Similarly, some of the games tend to encourage the development of audacity and leadership.”
pg.278, Mercenaries of Gor
“It is seldom wise, incidentally, to impugn, or attempt to manipulate, the honour of a Gorean.”
pg. 297, Mercenaries of Gor
“In Gorean culture, generally, it seemed to me that people stood closer to one another than I was accustomed to on Earth. In this way it was natural for men here, for example, to stand much closer to the scantily clad slave than the average man of, say, northern Europe, on Earth, would be likely to, to a woman of his area. Indeed, he usually stands so close to her that it would be easy for him to put his hands on her, and draw her to him, taking her in his arms.”
pg.156, Dancer of Gor
“On Earth, as I understand it, there are certain romantic notions about, for example, that heroes may be expected to `win’ damsels in distress, so to speak, by the performance of certain heroic behaviours which, for example, might bode little good to dragons, evil wizards, wicked knights, and such. These damsels in distress, once rescued, are then expected to elatedly bestow their fervent affectations on the blushing, bashful heroes, and so on. Needless to say, in real life, to the disappointment, and sometimes chagrin, of the blushing, bashful heroes, this denouement often fails to materialize. Although such notions are not unknown on Gor, the average Gorean tends to be somewhat more practical and business like than the average hero of such stories, if we may believe the stories. For example, the damsel of Earth, if she found herself rescued on Gor, might not have to spend a great deal of time gravely considering whether or not to bestow herself on the rescuer. She might rather find her wrists, to her surprise, being chained behind her, her clothing being removed and a rope being put on her neck. She might then find herself hurrying along on foot, beside his mount, roped by the neck to his stirrup.”
p.99-100, Renegades of Gor
“From the girl’s point of view, of course, she whose sex has in effect been hitherto denied to her, and who has hitherto encountered only men of Earth, most of whom have been sexually reduced or crippled by negativistic conditioning programs, and instructed to rejoice in the fact, Gor comes as a revelation. There they find men who, for the most part, are quite different from those they are accustomed to on Earth, strong, powerful, uninhibited, uncompromising men, men who have never been subjected to pathological conditioning programs aimed at the taming or debilitation of the male animal and its instincts, men who have never been tricked into the surrender of their natural dominance, men who have retained their sovereignty, that mighty sovereignty in nature without which they cannot be men, without which women cannot be women.”
pg.444-445, Vagabonds of Gor
“Gorean men do not surrender their birth right as males, their rightful dominance, their appropriate mastery. They do not choose to be dictated to by females.”
p.51, Magicians of Gor
“I might also mention, in passing… that many Gorean artists do not sign or otherwise identify their works. The rationale for this seems to be a conviction that what it important is the art, its power, its beauty, and so on, and not who formed it.. Indeed many Gorean artists seem to regard themselves as little more than vessels or instruments, the channels or means, the tools, say, the chisels or brushes, so to speak, by means of which the world, with its values and meanings, in its infinite diversities, in its beauties and its powers, its flowers and its storms, its laughter’s and rages, its delicacy and awesomeness, its subtlety and grandeur, expresses itself, and rejoices.”
pg.107, Magicians of Gor
“The focus of the Gorean artist, then, at least on the whole, tends to be on the work of art itself, not on himself as artist. Accordingly his attitude toward his art is less likely to be one of pride than one of gratitude. This makes sense as, in his view, it is not so much he who speaks as the world, in its many wonders, great and small, which speaks through him. He is thus commonly more concerned to express the world, and truth, than himself.”
pg.108, Magicians of Gor
“`Is not everyone to be permitted anything?’ `No,’ said Marcus, `Freedom is for the free. Others are to be kept inline, and exactly so. Society depends on divisions and order, each element stabilized perfectly in its harmonious relationship with all others.’ `You do not believe, then,’ I asked, `that everyone is the same, or must be supposed to be such, despite all evidence to the contrary, and that society thrives best as a disordered struggle?’ Marcus looked at me, startled. `No,’ I said `I see that you do not.’
pg.119, Magicians of Gor
“He was not a fellow of Earth, he was Gorean. Too, he was of the Warriors, and his codes, in a situation of this sort, their weapons drawn, entitled him, even encouraged him, to attack, and kill.”
pg.169, Magicians of Gor
“`You are still troubled,’ said Marcus. `It is like seeing a larl tricked into destroying himself,’ I said, `as though he were told that the only good larl is a sick, apologetic, self-suspecting, guilt-ridden larl. It is like vulos legislating for tarns, the end of which legislation is the death of the tarn, or its transformation into something new, something reduced, pathological and sick, celebrated then as the true tarn.’ `I do not even understand what you are saying,’ said Marcus. `That is because you are Gorean,’ I said.”
pg. 173-174, Magicians of Gor
“The Gorean tends neither to view the world as a mechanical clockwork of independent parts, as a great, regular, predictable machine, docile to equations, obedient to abstractions, nor as a game of chance, inexplicable, meaningless and random at the core. His fundamental metaphor in terms of which he would defend himself from the glory and mystery of the world is neither the machine nor the die. It is rather, if one may so speak, the stalk of grass, the rooted tree, the flower. He feels the world alive and real. He paints eyes upon his ships, that they may see their way. And if he feels so even about these vessels, then so much more the awed and reverent must he feel when he contemplates the immensity and grandeur, the beauty, the power and the mightiness within which he finds himself.”
pg. 254-255, Magicians of Gor
“It might also be noted, interestingly, that the Gorean, in spite of his awe of Priest-Kings, and the reverence he accords them, the gods of his world, does not think of them as having formed the world, nor of the world being in some sense consequent upon their will. Rather the Priest-Kings are seen as being its children, too, like sleen, and rain and man.”
pg.255, Magicians of Gor
“A last observation having to do with the tendency of some Goreans to accept illusions and such as reality is that the Gorean tends to take such things as honour and truth very seriously. Given his culture and background, his values, he is often easier to impose upon than would be many others. For example, he is likely, at least upon occasion, to be an easier mark for the fraud and charlatan than a more suspicious, cynical fellow. On the other hand, I do not encourage lying to Goreans. They do not like it.”
pg. 255, Magicians of Gor
“Goreans are not stupid. It is difficult to fool them more than once. They tend to remember… there would always be the dupes, of one sort or another, and the opportunists, and the cowards, with the irrationalizations. But, too, I speculated, there would be those of Ar to whom the Home Stone was a Home Stone, and not a mere rock, not apiece of meaningless earth.”
pg.489, Magicians of Gor
Back to The Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer Index
Copyright © 2006, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996. Marcus of Ar. All rights reserved.
©2020 by Azrael Phoenix
Posted on 2020-05-17 by Azrael Phoenix
This is part of the work on the Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer
7) Ideal Qualities in a Gorean Male
Below are a few which immediately come to mind.
You will note that the intricacies of “morality” are left entirely out of the picture, as well they should be. “Morality” is dependent upon cultural rules and religious beliefs, whereas the ideal character of the consummate Gorean male seems to be found across all Gorean cultures and walks of life.
Therefore, according to the list below, both Tarl Cabot (hero to millions) and Surbus (nasty murdering pirate from book 6) fit the bill of the consummate Gorean male architype equally.
Which seems to me to be an indication that one does not have to be “a nice guy” to be Gorean. In fact, one can even be a total brute, hated and despised by others. Whether or not one is a pleasant fellow to hang out with is something that is determined after the fact; one qualifies for Gorean male FIRST, before any such decision is rendered.
Here is my personal list, in no particular order:
Back to The Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer Index
Copyright © 2006, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996. Marcus of Ar. All rights reserved.
©2020 by Azrael Phoenix
Posted on 2020-05-17 by Azrael Phoenix
This is part of the work on the Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer
6) The Gorean Philosophy
The Gor books are an excellent source work which details a rather broad philosophical spectrum, but despite vehement debates regarding what it comprises, the message inherent in those books still seems to me to be a rather basic one. It might be broken down to the following statement:
Know who you are, be what you are, and do not be afraid to acknowledge what makes you tick. Strive to work with nature, rather than against it. Be proud of your accomplishments, work to improve yourself and to serve the citizens of your polis, and live boldly, with no regrets and as little guilt and insecurity as possible. And above all, acknowledge your weaknesses as well as your strengths, whether those weaknesses are based on either a physical or emotional plane. In other words, admit what you are, and simply be it to the best of your ability.
This basic philosophy is repeatedly hammered home, throughout the Gor series, through Norman’s descriptions of how Goreans think, how they behave, and their justification for their actions. Their very society, with its included caste system, seems structured to support this series of core beliefs. Even their many proverbs and aphorisms, such as “A man in his heart yearns for freedom, a woman in her belly yearns for love” and “Be strong and do as you will. The swords of others will set you your limits” extoll the virtues of a deeper understanding of one’s own natural place in the scheme of things, while encouraging boldness of action. The Goreans also believe that “A man is not a man who cannot think. But neither is he who can only think.” Goreans think for themselves, yet they do not confine themselves to mere mental pursuits: they act upon what they know. Goreans display their emotions openly and with the simple phrase “I did it because it pleased me to do so” they disdain the need for guilty excuses. Such Gorean behaviours, and a thousand others like them, reinforce their insistence upon the acceptance of one’s internal nature in microcosm, and the acknowledgement of the dictates of external nature in macrocosm.
Gorean Philosophy also proposes the following behaviours as being inherently correct beneath its aegis:
Be WHAT you are: Similar in many respects to a tenet set forth by the Earth philosopher Marcus Aurelius; namely that each thing which exists possesses its own unique singularity. When a thing attempts to be something it is not, problems arise. A man is a man; a woman is a woman; a tree is a tree; a flower is a flower. To the Gorean mind, it is foolish for anything to assume the properties of another thing. Therefore, each person is required to understand his or her basic nature, and to abide by it. According to such a tenet, therefore, it is assumed that there are needs, desires and activities which are specifically masculine, and those which are specifically feminine. Though the lines may blur at times, when all things are reduced to their basic forms, each thing is appreciated and celebrated for its own uniqueness, and is not forced to assume properties of another, different, thing.
Be WHO you are: This tenet applies in regard to a person’s existence in society and the caste structure. It takes into account the fact that everyone possesses certain talents and abilities from birth, regardless of their familial caste.
Therefore, upon Gor a person is free to alter or raise his or her caste on the basis of ability, though it is rarely done, since most Goreans value their familial caste as a badge of their clan identity. But the above principle also applies in regard to freedom and slavery. To the Gorean mindset, each person is born with a desire for freedom, and an innate slave nature. A person’s proper place in society is dependant upon how these two factors are balanced within the personality of that particular Gorean. Most Goreans believe that anyone who has within them a burning desire to exist free of strictures will not suffer slavery, dying rather than submitting to bonditude. A person who has within them a strong slave nature, the desire to be controlled and commanded, will eventually succumb to their inner need to serve others, free of all responsibility to things other than themselves and their service.
Obey the Natural Order of things: This tenet applies to the way Goreans view the world around them. They feel it is futile to attempt to disregard the effect of hundreds of generations of evolution. If a creature is naturally genetically equipped to fulfil a specific function in relation to another, then it is considered fitting and proper that such a creature be allowed to do so, even when such natural predisposition might result in stratification. In regards to human beings, it is understood that stronger, more intelligent, and more ambitious human beings will naturally assume a higher social strata in regards to their interaction with the less strong, less intelligent, and less ambitious.
In regard to male/female sexual relations, it is therefore the natural propensity of the male, who is genetically predisposed for physical dominance, to control certain physical aspects of his relationship to the female. In return, he is expected to behave as the hunter/provider, seeing to the protection of the female to insure the propagation of the race. Females, meanwhile, who tend to be smaller and less physically powerful, are expected to respect the biological truths of their lesser physical stature, while making the most of their genetic predisposition to serve and aid the male, and utilizing their superior emotional empathy and long-term endurance to do so while surviving and advancing the species. Not all women, therefore, are “slaves,” though the female sex is often referred to by Gorean males as “the slave sex.” Gorean females are simply expected to respect and understand that they are less able in areas requiring raw physical strength than their male counterparts, and adjust their behaviour accordingly. When one considers the fact that personal combat to the death is a daily occurrence throughout Gor, such behaviour among Gorean women is a wise practice to say the least.
Advancement of the Strong: This tenet is similar to that described above; it simply refers to the common Gorean belief that strength, whether it is physical strength, mental strength, or strength of will, should be celebrated and set forth as an example. In this way the Gorean feels he advances the human race, adding to its chances for survival and continued existence.
Diminishment of the Causes of Weakness: This principle acts as the inverse to the tenet described above. In order that the human species may grow stronger, it is necessary that the weaker and lesser adaptive elements of Gorean society be carefully controlled and encouraged to grow in strength and adaptability. Anti-social elements are to be excised from society through restriction of citizenship, or confined and rehabilitated. Warfare and enforced captivity are two methods by which this last end is accomplished upon the surface of the planet Gor.
Do what you will: This is one of the key principles to Gorean philosophy; basically, it means that every Gorean is expected to strive within the limits of his or her existence to achieve self-fulfilment and lasting happiness. A Warrior may draw his sword and lead an army to conquer a city, if he is strong enough and fit enough to do so. A free woman may attempt to contract a profitable companionship or to build a financial empire, if she is strong enough and clever enough. Even a slave is expected to seek her deepest self-fulfilment within the bonds of her Master’s chains. In such a manner, each Gorean is expected to strive and achieve something for the collective Gorean society, and struggle to attain perfection within the structure of that society. To the Gorean mind, there are always possibilities for advancement no matter what the situation.
Responsibility for One’s Actions: This tenet is based upon the Gorean concept of basic “cause and effect.” It is through the practice of this principle that the rest of the tenets listed above make sense, and function. This is the belief that everyone, no matter how great or humble, chooses the course of his or her destiny. When a warrior draws his sword, he can expect to suffer the consequences. When a Gorean submits to the bonds of slavery, he or she is expected to acknowledge and accept what occurs afterward. In such a way every choice made by every single Gorean is inextricably bound together with the choices of his or her fellow Goreans in a great interlinking web of cause and effect, a massive net of fate which moves the race forward into the future like an unstoppable juggernaut. Do whatever you want to, but expect it to effect you, either for good or ill. You are responsible for yourself. Excuses are futile and no one wants to hear them anyway. If you screw up, take your medicine, deal with the situation and move on to the next thing. The basic rules and maxims of the various caste codes and the fundamental principles of Gorean honour seem to be based mostly upon this concept; this, in effect, is the explanation for Gorean “cruelty.” Goreans are not cruel, they are practical. “That which does not kill them makes them stronger,” to paraphrase from Nietzsche. If you wear the collar of a slave, look like a slave, act like a slave, and do not either fight your way to freedom or die in the attempt, then you must really be one. In any case, you most probably were free at one point… so what happened? You either needed to be a slave, were too weak to stay free, or screwed up really badly somewhere along the way. Whatever the case, deal with it. Life is not fair, and most Goreans are far to practical to try to make it so. Life sucks. If you get hit on the head, don’t waste time crying about it… accept it and next time wear a helmet.
Stratification by Natural Process: Superior strength– be it strength of will, strength of body, or strength of mind– will tend naturally to manifest itself among ordered human groupings. Even particulars such as sexual gender do not universally define how matters of strength are involved in the stratification process. Anyone who is stronger will naturally assume a position of dominance, be it mental or physical, over those weaker or less willing to match themselves in human dominance struggles. Therefore, it is categorically incorrect to assign presumed dominance or blanket superiority over anyone, or any one grouping, within the human condition, since these matters tend to be somewhat situational. While human beings are defined to a great extent by their sex, there is no “dominance gene” nor is there any “submission gene.” There are only combinations of heritable genes, each of which will render the individual more prone to certain behaviours than others. These genetic leanings can be circumvented, though typically the act of doing so is costly, both to the individual involved and to the system in which he or she functions.
The final tenet, listed above, has only one interpretation: if anyone, be they male or female, possesses the ability to dominate others, he or she will naturally tend to do so when the opportunity presents itself, even against his or her pre-existent genetic propensities. It is when the dominance factor clashes with the biologically ingrained sexual selection behaviours, and circumvents pre-programmed sexual-based survival behaviours, that the human being becomes, to paraphrase Norman, “a mass of conflicting drives and emotions, more prone to heightened mental stress, physical illness, psychological disease and a substantially shortened lifespan.
Back to The Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer Index
Copyright © 2006, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996. Marcus of Ar. All rights reserved.
©2020 by Azrael Phoenix
Posted on 2020-05-17 by Azrael Phoenix
This is part of the work on the Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer
5) The Gorean Theory
The Gorean Theory is the belief that modern Homo Sapiens has inherited certain genetic propensities from the ancestral past, and that these genetic propensities still actively manifest themselves in numerous areas of human behaviour, often in direct opposition to cultural restrictions and behavioural management systems which fail to take them into account. These propensities translate into behaviours which result in a certain measurable cause and effect relationship in regards to many elements of human interaction, notably male/male competition behaviours and both male and female sexual reproductive strategies.
Ergo, by gaining a greater understanding of those genetic propensities and by acting, where possible, in a manner through which those propensities are fulfilled rather than repressed, one might reasonably expect to reduce stress-causing confusion issues in one’s life and live in a more fulfilled and personally satisfactory manner.
Back to The Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer Index
Copyright © 2006, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996. Marcus of Ar. All rights reserved.
©2020 by Azrael Phoenix
Posted on 2020-05-17 by Azrael Phoenix
This is part of the work on the Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer
4) The Ten Irrefutable Dicta of the Gorean Philosophy
The following is a list of the ten primary dicta, or explanatory statements, of the “Gorean Philosophy,” as I see it. You will note there is no reference to the practice of slavery among them. That is because the practice of slavery is not a primary pillar of the Gorean philosophy; rather it is a social practice which has come into being on Gor as a result of specific technological limitations, Gorean economic imperatives, and the persistent adherence of Goreans to the basic concepts explained below.
Nor is the word “honour” used. That is because honour is also a concept and practice which has developed among the Goreans as a result of the application of the dicta below, notably the fifth and sixth dictums.
I add that, to the typical inhabitant of the world of Gor, the concepts expressed below would be so self-evident they wouldn’t even bother to name or define them at all. They would simply practice them, as the Gor books tell us they do. The “Ten Dicta” below have been compiled purely for the benefit of the inhabitants of Earth, who, bereft of the supporting mechanism of Gorean society, are left to fumble through the murky landscape of Earth, attempting to find such rules and concepts to use as guideposts as they attempt to glean the truths of Gorean existence for themselves.
Please note that accepting these dicta do not automatically make one “Gorean.” There are, undoubtedly, quite a few people out there who do accept these concepts in some way, shape or form, who have never even heard of “Gor” and who have no idea that the Gorean Philosophy even exists. Also, one might embrace these dicta while refusing to acknowledge the other elements which combine to comprise the Gorean Philosophy in its entirety, in which case, again, one is not getting the whole picture. However, in my opinion, the refusal to accept and embrace the dicta listed below DO make a person absolutely NOT Gorean.
So, if one wishes to be Gorean, or to understand what it means to be Gorean, one might do well to examine the ideas expressed below and decide whether or not one agrees with them.
All of the concepts below, with the exception of the tenth, are distilled almost directly from the words of Tarl Cabot, in his description of the manner in which Goreans think. The tenth one is simply and categorically self-evident.
The First Dictum
We are all creatures formed from nature, and are therefore subject to the truths of what it has made of us. This cannot be denied.
The Second Dictum
We are all part of our world, and the natural forces which made it. We are not apart from it, nor are we above it, nor can we deny its power over us. It is folly to attempt to change what cannot be changed, or to refuse to acknowledge the power which nature has over us. This cannot be denied.
The Third Dictum
The two sexes, male and female, are equal parts of the same great whole which is the human race. Equal, but separate, each bound to perform the function which it has evolved into through the course of time. This cannot be denied.
The Fourth Dictum
The greatest division which exists between human beings is the division of sex. Race, creed, nationality… all pale to insignificance when compared to the difference between the two sexes. This cannot be denied.
The Fifth Dictum
The highest devotion is the devotion to truth. The most beneficial acceptance is the acceptance of what is true. The most foolish and damaging act one can perform is the denial of what is true. Such denial is the wellspring from which the ravages of discontent emerge. This cannot be denied.
The Sixth Dictum
Conflict, argument, and clannishness are all fundamental parts of our human nature. Left to their own devices, such things result in stagnation and destruction. But when understood and harnessed in the service of the greater good, they can be a positive force for personal growth and development. This cannot be denied.
The Seventh Dictum
In matters of physical strength, the human male is naturally equipped by nature to function at a higher level of efficiency than the human female. In matters of emotional sensitivity and the innate desire to care for and nurture those she loves, the human female is naturally equipped by nature to function at a higher level of efficiency than the human male. The human male is programmed to protect and direct his female counterparts. The human female is programmed to aid and care for her male counterparts. The members of each sex are more fulfilled when they accept their own nature, rather than denying it. This cannot be denied.
The Eighth Dictum
All creatures will naturally behave according to their inherent nature. To do otherwise is the first step toward emotional and biological suicide. This cannot be denied.
The Ninth Dictum
Human society, like the natural order, will naturally structure itself along certain lines of precedence. The stronger and more able elements of human society will naturally rise to a position of superiority over the less dominant elements of society. The protectors and providers will naturally protect and provide, and the nurturers and care givers will naturally nurture and give care. Any artificial manipulation of the natural structure of a society, which is not according to its natural propensities, will eventually result in a society which is far less efficient and fulfilling than its natural counterpart. This cannot be denied.
The Tenth Dictum
The Gorean societal model is based upon specific guidelines set forth by John Norman in the books which he authored regarding the fictional planet Gor. Unless it conforms to, or agrees with, those basic guidelines, a thing cannot be considered “Gorean” in any sense of the word. This cannot be denied.
Back to The Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer Index
Copyright © 2006, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996. Marcus of Ar. All rights reserved.
©2020 by Azrael Phoenix
Posted on 2020-05-17 by Azrael Phoenix
This is part of the work on the Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer
3) The Gorean Argument
3a) Men and women are not identical. In fact, the two sexes are almost completely different in every way. They look different, think different, act different, feel different, and respond to two completely different emotional response-systems. Each sex has its own preprogramed agenda, its own requirements for personal fulfilment, and its own methods of communicating. This difference between the two sexes has its roots in the basic biology of the human race, a biology which has been shaped through evolution to predispose each sex toward certain behavior and emotional conditions. According to Norman (and medical science), no single cell of a male’s body is identical to any single cell of a female’s body (except for small quantities of clear serum).
3b) Human males are biologically predisposed toward physical dominance over human females, who are, on the average, physically smaller and less strong than their male counterparts.
3c) The process of evolution has naturally selected for strong, competitive males and females who were both desirable to such men, and who were in turn attracted to such men.
3d) The vestiges of countless millennia of this selection process still exist within each of us, and we are all therefore subject to emotional needs and instinctive drives which our present society does not provide for.
3e) Since males and females all seem to be subject to certain drives and needs which were bred into them during a period of time when women were effectively within the physical power of men, doesn’t it make sense that if that situation were recreated somehow, then the two sexes might attain a specific degree of fulfilment which would otherwise be denied to them? Wouldn’t they then be accepting a part of their own inherent nature rather than denying it?
Back to The Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer Index
Copyright © 2006, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996. Marcus of Ar. All rights reserved.
©2020 by Azrael Phoenix
Posted on 2020-05-17 by Azrael Phoenix
This is part of the work on the Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer
2) The First Underlying Principle of Gorean Perception
“The Acknowledgement of Difference”:
The understanding and acceptance that all human beings are not inherently identical in form or function, nor is it logical that they be expected to be so.
For more details, see the posts:
Back to The Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer Index
Copyright © 2006, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996. Marcus of Ar. All rights reserved.
©2020 by Azrael Phoenix
Posted on 2020-05-17 by Azrael Phoenix
This is part of the work on the Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer
1) The Three Essential Gorean Virtues
Their names, and more importantly, their correct Gorean definitions:
Strength:
The state, property, or quality of being strong. Capacity or potential for effective action.
Integrity:
The state of being unimpaired. The quality or condition of being whole or undivided; completeness.
Vigour:
Enthusiasm or intensity. Capacity for natural growth and survival.
Back to The Principles of Gorean Thought – A Primer Index
Copyright © 2006, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996. Marcus of Ar. All rights reserved.
©2020 by Azrael Phoenix
Posted on 2020-05-17 by Azrael Phoenix
Marcus of AR is a well known writer regarding the lifestyle of Gor and it’s philosophy!
On the ongoing process of making available several of his amazing texts, I decided to organise this wonderful work: “The Principles of Gorean Thought”, divided into several sections for easier read:
This is another collection of amazing texts and information, directly focused to help us all understand better our nature and the truth about the Gorean Lifestyle and the Natural Order.
I wish you well!
©2020 by Azrael Phoenix
Posted on 2020-05-16 by Azrael Phoenix
I’ve lost count on the overwhelming amount of times I have heard a kajira ramble about how miserable she is and stating her ‘shortcomings’ as facts that she is not worthy of serving her Master, so I’ve decided to share some thoughts on this subject!
Today, while discussing about Gorean topics, a friend remembered a quote I love:
Ute had informed me, though I had been aware of such things before, even on Earth, that the most desirable women are not always those of incredible beauty. Desirability is a function of many factors, many of them subtle. Goreans believe, or many of them do, that each woman carries a slave within themselves, but that the slave in some is more desperate for her release than in others. It is said that some slavers, standing before a captured, stripped free woman, can make this determination. They take her by the arms and command her to look into their eyes; then, if she is ready, so soon, in her eyes, frightened and tear-filled, they can see the slave longing for her collar, begging for it. In any event, it is obvious that some of the most desirable of slaves, loving, needful and devoted, helplessly responsive to a master’s least touch, are not those who might be chosen for the purposes of display, perhaps in a pleasure garden or on a silver neckchain bolted to a palanquin. Many an angry young man of modest means returns, disappointed and frustrated, from the market, leading home on his tether the most that he can afford, an item of what he takes to be second-rate merchandise; but he discovers, perhaps after introducing her to the house, and tying her and giving her the customary ceremonial beating that she may know herself slave there, something surprising; released, she crawls to his feet and covers them, and his legs, with kisses, and then, holding his legs timidly, she looks up into his eyes, her own tear-filled; and, startled, he sees suddenly at his feet something priceless, that fortune is his, that in the lotteries of the market he has been unaccountably victorious; at his feet there kneels a slave of slaves, one who may become to him, in time, even a love slave.
Captive of Gor
What are a slave’s characteristics (and sometimes physical limitations) is one thing, but what she does with what she has is something entirely different!!! So stop comparing yourself with all other kajirae trying to find where they are better than yourself, and focus on looking inward, and focusing on how you can improve!!!
Ok, you can’t be on your knees for extended periods of time (keep in mind that in GOR the gravity is much lower and it is physically impossible to fully replicate on Earth the flawless kneeling for hours if necessary), you can’t be the most perfect of all the kajirae on the universe and you’re always going to find something someone else does better than you or something you consider yourself lacking…
SO WHAT? Yes, that’s what I said: SO WHAT?
A kajira will never be perfect! It’s not a matter of reaching the holly grail of servitude, it’s all about living a life of continuous improvement and focusing on the present moment and not on what might, eventually, who knows, possibly be considered a shortcoming!
Girls, let me tell you something, all the seconds you spend dwelling on “perceived problems” it’s a second you waste digging the hole you’re already in, and making it all that harder to get out!!!
You know what is the first rule of action to take when you find yourself on a hole? STOP DIGGING!!!
Yes, it’s good not to get relaxed and to be alert to any shortcomings! But that is to “acquire the target”, to identify something that is not right, in order to engage in actions to overcome it!
First of all, there is a difference between being alert to possible problems and actually going on crusades trying to find things in you that you can somehow criticise!
Second of all, considering that the “raw material” inherently will have flaws, the most important thing for a Master is how a kajira plays the cards that life dealt her! As the quote above, some perfectly “plain looking” girls turn out to be absolutely ravishing in the furs and in life! Not because of their physical attributes, but of their “mindset”, of their absolute surrender and committal to unrestrained devotion to live in that moment and extract all the magnificent sensation from each instant!
Get one thing in your head (or at least try to), a slave is worthless in itself and her only value is how the Master values her!
As a free woman I had been priceless, and thus, in a sense, without value, or worthless. As a slave, on the other hand, I did have a value, a specific value, depending on what men were willing to pay for me.
Dancer of Gor
Don’t dwell on the past and don’t suffer in advance regarding future possible shortcomings! Live in the moment, live in the present! In each moment, try to be the best version of yourself!
If any insecurity or dark thought creeps into your mind, feel the whip of the Master in your skin and exorcise those thoughts from your mind! It’s not up to you to judge how worthy you are, you must live fulfilled in the present moment, being as pleasant as humanly possible.
I know that the female nature is intricate and complex and that the conditioning imposed by the society we live in is overwhelming in many aspects! But if I can give any advice today, this is it: If you are at the feet of a Master is because you were found of some value, so revel in it and try in each moment to be the most pleasant property, perfectly and abjectly devoted to the present moment and finding ways to be the best version of yourself in the little actions that you perform! Leave the rest in the hand of the Master and you will see your servitude and fulfilment blossom each day!
I wish you well!
©2020 – Written by Azrael Phoenix
Posted on 2020-05-16 by Azrael Phoenix
A (SAMPLE) GOREAN MASTER’S CREED by _Marcus_ of Ar
Above all else a Gorean Master values his slave and understands the vulnerability of her position upon his chain. Knowing that she has assumed her correct place in the Gorean social system he is bound to compel her to behave as what she is, and to correct her as she strives to achieve the utmost fulfilment of her natural needs.
– A Gorean Master is demanding and takes full advantage of the power he wields, but accepts the responsibility which comes with his Mastery. He takes pride in the achievements of his slaves, and rewards their devoted service by administering pleasure as he sees fit.
– A Gorean Master is first and foremost Master of himself. Until he can Master himself, how can he Master others?
– A Gorean Master holds the power to compel his slave to weep real tears, but is wise and compassionate enough to do so only in the best interests of his Mastery and to ensure that she grows in her slavery. A Gorean Master will reward his slave generously as he sees fit, also to compel obedience and to promote growth in her slavery. Whether he is punishing or comforting, he never forgets that he is the Master.
– A Gorean Master’s role is never dictated merely by time or location. He will remember that the feelings and emotions of his slave are a vital part of his relationship with her, and will not hesitate to comfort or offer solace to his slave, should it seem good to him.
– To be a Gorean Master a man must be strong enough to command his slave’s respect and her trust, so that she may serve him willingly in the knowledge that he will allow nothing less. A Gorean Master will strive at all times to guide and to teach a slave the truths of her position in Gorean society, and upon his chain.
– A Gorean Master is not afraid to demonstrate his humor, his kindness, and his warmth. A Gorean Master in not an uncaring machine, though often he may behave as one. The slave understands this and appreciates his softer qualities when they manifest.
– A Gorean Master should, through his deeds and actions, demonstrate to his slave that he is worthy of her service to him. He must be strong enough to maintain her under the strictest discipline even in an informal setting. He must prove himself inflexible when the situation requires it, and be wise enough to allow some leeway when it, too, is necessary.
– A Gorean Master will be strong enough to defend what is his, when it becomes necessary. He will protect his slave from the consequences of his own folly, and see to it that she is suitably corrected when she errs. He is a pillar of strength which she may lean on in times of duress, and his slave may take heart in knowing that he is there to Master her and maintain her in her slavery.
– When it comes time to instruct his slave and to compel her obedience, he is a strong and unyielding teacher. A Gorean Master will accept no flaw in his slave’s performance in regards to her actions, and will make certain that those actions please persons who are free. His slave is always under his eye, even when serving another free Gorean.
– A Gorean Master may punish his slave at any time, for any reason. When he does so, however, it is always to serve a purpose, and to maintain his Mastery according to his position in Gorean society.—A Gorean Master will always pay the strictest attention to the feelings and emotional needs of his slave, fulfilling them when he deems it appropriate.
– A Gorean Master will utilize whatever means he feels is necessary to compel his slave to accept and maintain her position in Gorean society.
– A Gorean Master seeks to learn more of himself from his slave, and is wise enough to know that he is not always correct. He expects his slave to allow him to discover these things for himself, as he is free.
– A Gorean Master understands that each partner gains most from fulfilling the other’s needs, be they the need to serve or the need to command.
– And a Gorean Master knows that should he be too weak to Master his slave, she will not be his slave for long.
I wish you well,
_Marcus_
Copyright © 2006, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996, _Marcus_ of Ar. All rights reserved.
Posted on 2020-05-15 by Azrael Phoenix
BEING GOREAN ON EARTH by _Marcus_ of Ar
Tal, all!
Not long ago I was asked:
“What does it mean to be Gorean on Earth? How do we reconcile our beliefs with the reality of living in a society where our practice of those beliefs is constricted?”
My beliefs are not constricted at all. I can believe anything I want to.
What I can try to do, also, is adapt the customs of Gorean culture into my personal lifestyle to as great an extent as possible.
As to how far one can take it, it simply never struck me as much of a problem, or even a valid question.
Why?
Well… how many Goreans, after the entrance into Ar by the Cosian occupation force, told the Cosians to stick their new rules up their collective asses and went right on doing things as they had before?
Not too many. Most of those who did probably wound up playing the part of the olive, to the big martini-skewer one might call “an impaling spear.”
Goreans are bold, and terrible in their wrath. But they are not inordinately stupid.
So what did they do?
They obeyed the new rules. Oh, they resisted… but when they did so, they did so carefully. They chose when and how they would resist. They kept their revolutionary fires alight within their hearts and behind the walls and doors of their houses. The Cosians ruled the streets, but the heart of Ar lived on, quietly awaiting the day when it could throw off the yoke of Cosian oppression.
What about Gorean agents of the Priest-Kings who live on Earth? Do they obey Earth’s rules and accept Earth’s social mores, in public if not, entirely, in private?
Of course they do. They are on Earth. They take slaves, and keep slaves, but while existing upon Earth they are quite cautious about how they interact in what is (for them) a hostile environment.
Living a Gorean lifestyle is like that, I feel. One must choose cautiously how one will resist the laws and strictures of his society. When in Rome, as was once said here on Earth, one must do as the Romans do, and one must render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s.
We do not do what our society prohibits us from doing. We do not break the law. That would be inviting wrath down upon ourselves from our shared Earth society, as if we needed THAT to contend with. Instead we adapt our lifestyles as we see fit, and take it as far as we can. And occasionally stretch the limits of what “vanilla” society will tolerate, just to see what happens. But when we do so, we do so wisely, and carefully, within the limits of the law.
The only two modes of ACTION which exist upon Gor, which might not be tolerated here on Earth, are murder and rape.
Murder is not tolerated on Gor, typically, either. Self-defense and the right to personal combat are allowed there, however. But even on Gor, like on Earth, one must fight only within the boundaries set by society for such things.
Rape is not tolerated on Gor, either.
And everyone gasps! How can that be?
Here’s why: because one cannot “rape” a legal slave. Not on Gor. They are not technically “people” under the eyes of the law. The only one who can be “raped” is one who is legally entitled to say “no.” In other words, a Free Woman.
What one must do, upon Earth, is simply revise the Gorean view that slaves are not people under the law, and accept that upon Earth, slaves ARE people under the law. Which the obviously are. The law has nothing to do with their bellies or their biological propensities, not here on Earth. Here, they are slaves by choice and circumstance, not under any legality which makes them so.
Therefore, we consider them to be protected under the legal blanket which protects “free women” here on Earth. We use the dictates of common sense and implied or confirmed consent to allow us carte blanche in our treatment of them, and only halt ourselves at the place where the law stops us.
I was also told, recently, the following:
“If rape of a slave on Gor is legal, and of course it is, then so is murder for the same reason. In fact, this is made clear in the books.”
This is a statement which bears further consideration. It is not that I do not agree with it; but there are other valid points to consider.
First of all, the difference between the legal crime of “rape” as we define it here on Earth versus the concept of “slave rape” as it exists upon Gor.
Upon Gor, in a strictly legal sense (as in, how Gorean Law treats such matters) the crime of “rape” (as a crime, and not as the simple usage of an owned property) does exist, and there are laws which address it. We are told by Norman that when a Free Woman is “raped” she has legal recourse (not to mention a bevy of brothers and other male relatives who might enact their own vengeance against the perpetrator of such an act).
Slaves are not protected under this point of Gorean Law, however. The rights to their usage fall under different legal structures, and are more in line with “usage of someone else’s property without due process and the obtainment of permission.” Therefore, the laws which protect slaves (as owned property) are a bit different as they pertain to the usage of a slave, whereas the laws which protect legal citizens from such an action are much more stringent.
Consent seems to be a very important part of this. A Free Woman, by consenting to such an action, opens the door to usage as if she were, indeed, a slave, or an owned property. The Gorean Laws which cover this are quite detailed, and thoroughly explore the concept of “conduct indicating suitability for enslavement.”
Upon Gor, that is.
Here on Earth, the laws which pertain to such activity are different. First of all, the state of “legal slavery” is not recognized under the law. Therefore, one must look to the laws of our shared Earth society to make judgments about what is, and is not, appropriate behavior, and one must adjust his own behavior accordingly. This seems to me to be a simple point of common sense and responsibility to the legalities under which one lives.
The Gorean laws which adjudicate “murder” are similar. They are not the same as the laws which exist upon Earth… then again, they are not that different. Upon Gor, for instance, if one draws a weapon and attacks the other, it is considered prudent for the attacked to defend himself to the fullest extent of his ability to do so. Our Earth laws agree with this. Upon Gor it is called “the right of response to a challenge.” Upon Earth it is called “self-defense.”
Again, the slaying of a legal slave, upon Gor, falls instead under property law. Here on Earth, such a thing is not in existence… people are people, under the law, and are all therefore entitled to identical protection from assault under the law.
When one understands this, and realizes that the existence of such property laws upon Gor are a result of the fact that Gor is a slave-holding culture, whereas most societies on Earth no longer support such a convention, then the actions of Goreans regarding such matters, as described in the books, begin to make sense.
Shall we therefore ignore the laws of our culture and do as the Goreans do in the books, under their own cultural laws and restrictions?
Of course not. We are not in a slave-holding culture. The legal status of slavery is no longer recognized as valid in our current society, which is not necessarily a bad thing, either, when one considers it. Earth culture has, for the most part, outgrown the legal practice of slavery, since it no longer fulfills the economic niche it once did here on Earth. Throughout most of the world it is no longer practical, due to mechanization and plentiful sources of relatively inexpensive labor in our modern milieu.
It has been suggested to me that Gor is entirely fictional, and is therefore an invented society which could never actually exist.
Not entirely true. Yes, Gor is fictional; still, most of what is depicted in the Gor books, involving the treatment and ownership of slaves and the allowance of personal combat in one’s day-to-day existence is NOT fictional. It actually existed in our Earth cultures, in various historical contexts. Nor did it cause those societies to fall apart.
Rather, such ideas and modes of behaviour were abandoned as being no longer practical due to the technological and societal changes which have since occurred here on Earth. Slavery, as a practice, was not widely considered immoral until long after it had become unnecessary. It is true, I add, that the continual cheapening of human life does have rather unpleasant consequences within the structure of any society. The fall of the Roman Empire was an excellent example… the widespread misuse of slaves, the continued reliance on owned human beings, and their mistreatment did much to shake the morality which underscored that society, weakening it.
The same can be said of our modern society (the United States being a prime example). The cheapening of human life has grown to epidemic proportions in our present society (without slavery, even… simply due to our continual media obsession with violence); not only that, but the existence of common-sense morality in our society, no longer shored up by such “outmoded” behavioural qualifiers such as honor, basic honesty, and a shared sense of responsibility, has been consigned to the backburner. Hence the strange societal lassitude in which we find ourselves nowadays.
I was also told the following:
“My point is not only is it not possible to take all aspects of Gorean society into this society, it is morally wrong to attempt to do so.”
That would depend upon one’s particular morality, of course.
Morality, like the structure of laws under which we live, is both relative and situational. Most of us maintain a series of moral dictates within which we live our lives. Some rely upon “common-sense” morality, i.e. behaving in such a way as to defend oneself while taking no unfair advantage of others. Others subscribe to a set of moral beliefs emplaced by devotion to a particular religion. However, our moral good sense is affected by the common morals of the society around us. Our morals are therefore mutable, depending upon what we have been taught by others, and what we have learned through experience.
Morality is at best an ambiguous concept, unless it has real power behind it, in which case a particular set of moral codes can be enforced upon others. This is accomplished through the application of the law.
The way it works is this: the group morality and practicality gives rise to the law; the law then forces those under it to conform to that group morality and practicality to continue to exist within that group.
Gorean morality, while similar to modern Earth morality in many respects, does deviate from current cultural and societal norms at times, particularly in the area of slave-use and slave-treatment. Then again, since upon Earth there are no longer legal slaves (in Western culture, anyway), that makes sense. Modern Earth morality has come into being outside of the loop of slave culture, and makes no provisions for such things.
I see it thusly: in our modern Earth culture, there are no slaves. The closest thing to “legal slaves” in existence in Western culture are prison convicts, those who have been stripped of their legal rights under the law, and in many cases assigned a number in place of a name. They have been so treated because they have violated the law and have therefore surrendered their freedom under that law, and have come under the direct 24/7 control of the state.
This state of being, to the Gorean, is similar in many respects to slavery.
Therefore, would any Gorean Free Man or Free Woman actively behave in such a manner as to invite enslavement? Nope. It is antithetical to their existence. Goreans love their freedom. They love it so much, in fact, that they will even take it away from those whom they do not feel have earned it, or deserve it.
As one who practices the Gorean philosophy in his doings, I would never do anything foolish which might inadvertently result in my reduction to slavery… i.e. my loss of freedom and surrender of my legal rights to the state. Therefore, I would be quite cautious when it comes to doing anything which might result in my enslavement… i.e. my entering the penal system as a legally imbonded prisoner.
Morals, like laws, are made by the culture in which one lives. It is our responsibility to behave in such a way that we do not remove ourselves from that society. If we cannot live within the parameters of the laws of our society, we should leave that society and go elsewhere.
Morals are also rather ambiguous, as I said above, and are subject to change. My morals, were I too live upon Gor, or within ancient Greek or Roman society, might be much different. In any case, even if my personal moral codes did not match those officially recognized by the state, my behavior would be expected to conform to what is required of me by my society. Not my personal morals… but my behavior.
For any interested, my own moral codes insist that the act of enslaving a human being (I mean REALLY enslaving them, as in, capturing them and chaining them to a bench with an oar in their hand) to force them to do or to be something which they are not, is often morally wrong and therefore incorrect. The Goreans feel the same, for the most part; it is simply that they must deal with the fact that, upon Gor, the weak are often subjugated by the strong and forced into such bondage. The immorality of this practice is not an issue with them. We might as well say it is an immoral act to drive a car and pollute the environment; immoral or not, it is not something which can be halted, currently, due to practical considerations.
Now, the act of forcing another human being to be something which they ARE, without a shadow of a doubt, is much more acceptable to me. Kicking a lousy basketball player off the team, for instance. Or arresting a criminal that they might be judged. Or even recognizing that a female who is not willing to actually behave as a slave, to Free Men, is NOT worthy of being called such and kicking her ass back out into the morass of the “almosts” and “half-ways.”
And if someone proves to me, through their actions, that they are willing to walk the difficult path of voluntary slavery, simply because it is what they ARE, then it seems immoral to me to deny them that opportunity.
I feel It is good that we live in a modern society which, though it does not allow legal slavery, DOES allow for the practice of voluntary slavery provided it does not violate the law. This is a good state of affairs for any self-proclaimed slaves out there, allowing all of us to have our cake and to eat it, too.
I am not a self-proclaimed slave. But I do know several such individuals, and they actually do exist. It makes sense that they be allowed to be what they are, and what fulfills them, simply because it makes them more well-adjusted and better able to contribute to their interpersonal relationships in a manner which is more efficient and pleasant for all concerned.
Their “slavery” would be much different upon Gor… or maybe not. Gorean morality accepts the need to assimilate involuntary slaves into the slave system there, as a matter of practicality. Here upon Earth, where our society does not support this, it simply means that there are no “involuntary slaves” here, and therefore all who enter “enslavement” of their own free will do so because they have chosen to do so. And Norman repeatedly tells us that the best, most devoted, and usually the most well-treated slaves are those who find personal fulfillment in their position upon a Master’s chain.
Why anyone would ASK to be enslaved then complain vehemently when they are treated as if they are slaves, remains a mystery to me. Perhaps they are not really slaves at all, and simply crave attention?
In any case… morality varies. Responsibility to one’s society does not. Since none of us can pack our bags and move to Gor, we all must do what we can to live as fulfilled Goreans in our current (and only) society and remain within its strictures in body if not in mind.
Too easy, if you ask me.
I wish you well,
_Marcus_
Copyright © 2001, _Marcus_ of Ar. All rights reserved.
Posted on 2020-05-14 by Azrael Phoenix
Information Posted by Lee Johnson on https://www.facebook.com/notes/gorean-lifestyle-teachings/kaissa-and-variants/2063187980382462/
WHAT IS KAISSA?
Kaissa or “the game” is taken from passages of the books of Gor by John Norman. Kaissa is played differently throughout the books. The books provide much information about the game, though they do not provide a complete set of rules for playing the game. It is at this point that PortKar Industries filled in the blanks. The three variations found here are the only official PortKar endorsed versions under US copyright law. Each in there own way partially supported by the books.
BASICS OF THE GAME
Kaissa though similar to chess, is played with more pieces on a larger board. There are ten different playing pieces, with twenty one or twenty two pieces per side depending on the variation played. Pieces represent warriors of cities at war, each attempting to capture the other’s Home stone. There are two sides Yellow and Red, Yellow plays first. The Home stone is the most important piece it represents the heart of your city. It is what you must protect and it is your opponent’s Home stone you must capture.
Merchants Kaissa
A variation chess built upon the information provided about Kaissa “the game” from the books of Gor by John Norman. In this variation the creator found at Kaissa.org fills in some piece movements where the story left off to provide a more complete and balanced game.
Ubar(UB)
The Ubar or King is the most powerful piece on the board. He can move, as far as he likes in any direction similar to the Queen in chess, so long as his way is not impeded by another piece. The Ubar is a back row piece and he can be taken anytime during play. His loss does not constitute the end of the game. That only occurs when the home stone is captured or an opponent resigns.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Ubara(UA)
The Ubara, the Ubar’s mate functions pretty much like the, except that she is restricted to three squares in any one direction, so long as her way is not impeded by another piece . The Ubara is also a back row piece. The Ubara, at the start of the game, rests on a square of her own color, next to the Ubar.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Tarnsman(TN)
The Tarnsman is represented by a man sitting on top of a giant hawk like bird. His moves are three squares up and two over in any direction; the only piece on the board that can go over or around another piece. There are two Tarnsman to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Scribe(SC)
The Scribe moves diagonally on his own color, forward or backward, but is limited to five squares in either direction, so long as his way is not impeded by another piece. There are two Scribes to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Builder(BD)
The Builder moves on the board, forward, backward and laterally in both directions, with no limit to the number of squares he can advance, so long as his way is not impeded by another piece. There are two Builders to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Initiate
The Initiate is a high priest, and not to be trusted. He too, like the Scribe, moves on the diagonal; except, unlike the Scribe, the Initiate has no limit to the number of squares he can advance, so long as his way is not impeded by another piece. He is also limited to his own color.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Spearman(SP)
The Spearman is the first of the front row pieces. He moves forward only and captures only on the diagonal. On his first move, the Spearman has the option of moving one, two, or three squares forward. After that he advances only one square at a time, no matter which option he chose. Unlike a chess pawn a spearman cannot be redeemed for a lost higher piece by advancing him to your opponent’s back row. There are six Spearmen to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Rider of The “High Thalarion”(HT)
Flanking the six Spearmen in the front row, one on each side, is a Rider of the High Tharlarion, or lizard rider. He can move one square in any direction, so long as his way is not impeded by another piece. There are two Rider’s of The High Thalarion to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Assasin(A)
Flanking the two Riders of the High Tharlarion in the front row, one on each side, is an Assassin. An Assassin can move two squares in any direction forward, backward, laterally or diagonally, so long as his way is not impeded by another piece. There are two Assassins to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Home stone
The Home stone is what the game of Kaissa is all about. It does not start on the board, but must be placed on the board after the seventh move and on or before, but not later than the tenth move. The placement of the Home stone constitutes a move on it’s own. If the Home stone is not placed on or before the tenth move, the game is over by default. The object is to capture your opponent’s Home stone, without losing your own. When a Home stone is captured, or a Player resigns the game is over. The Home stone can move one square in any one unimpeded direction. It cannot capture other pieces. The placement of the Home stone on the board is yours and your opponent’s choice. The Home stone must be placed on the back row of your playing pieces. It cannot be placed on an already occupied square.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Kaissa Red Piece Placement
Kaissa Layout
Kaissa Yellow Piece Placement

Northern Kaissa
This variation of chess is played by the savage Masters of the North, Northern Kaissa from the books of Gor by John Norman. In this variation the creator assembles piece movements referenced to in the books and compares the similarities to Merchants Kaissa and using this information the two are combined to fill in where the story left off providing a complete and balanced chess game.
Jarl(JL)
The Jarl of the Lodge, is the most powerful piece on the board. He can move, on the board, as far as He likes in any direction, as long as His way is not impeded by another piece. The Jarl is a back row piece His loss does not constitute the end of the game. That only occurs when the Lodge is captured or an opponent resigns.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Jarl’s Woman(JW)
The Jarl’s woman, functions pretty much like her mate, the Jarl, except that she is restricted to five squares in any one direction, as long as her way is not impeded by another piece. The Jarl’s Woman, at the start of the game, rests on a square of her own color, next to the Jarl.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Axe(AX)
The Axe moves three squares up and two over in any direction; it is the only piece on the board that can go over or around another piece. There are two Axes to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Singer(SI)
The Singer moves diagonally on his own color, forward or backward, but is limited to five squares in either direction, as long as his way is not impeded by another piece. There are two Singers to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Rune Priest(RP)
The Rune Priest like the Singer, moves on the diagonal; except, unlike the Singer, the Rune Priests have no limit to the number of squares they can advance, as long as his way is not impeded by another piece. He is also limited to his own color.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Builder(BD)
The Builder moves on the board, forward, backward and laterally in both directions with no limit to the number of squares he can advance, so long as his way is not impeded by another piece. There are two Builders to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Spearman(SP)
The Spearman is the first of the front row pieces. He moves forward only and captures only on the diagonal. On his first move, the Spearman has the option of moving one, two, or three squares forward. After that he advances only one square at a time, no matter which option he chose. A spearman, unlike the pawn of chess cannot be redeemed for a lost higher piece by advancing him down to an opponents back row. There are six Spearmen to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Rider of The “High Thalarion”(HT)
Flanking the six Spearmen in the front row, one on each side, is a Rider of the High Tharlarion, or lizard rider. He can move one square in any direction, so long as his way is not impeded by another piece. There are two Rider’s of The High Thalarion to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Physician(PH)
Flanking the two Riders of the High Tharlarion in the front row, one on each side, is a Physician. He can move up to two squares in a straight line, forward, backwards or to the side as long as his way is not impeded by another piece. There are two Physicians to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Lodge
The Lodge is what the game is all about. It does not start on the board, but must be placed on the board after the second move and on or before, but not later than the tenth move. The placement of the Lodge constitutes a move on it’s own. If the Lodge is not placed on or before the tenth move, the game is over by default. The object is to capture your opponent’s Lodge, without losing your own. When a Lodge is captured, or a Player resigns the game is over.. The Lodge can move one square in any one unimpeded direction. It cannot capture other pieces. The placement of the Lodge on the board is yours and your opponent’s choice. The Lodge must be placed on the back row of your playing pieces. It cannot be placed on an already occupied square.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Kaissa Red Piece Placement

Computer based Kaissa
GC Kaissa
A new type of chess built upon the information of Kaissa “the game” from the books of Gor by John Norman. In this variation the creator modifies some piece movements to more closely resemble chess and level the playing field of all the pieces involved making some slightly weaker and some slightly stronger but the goal is the same.
Ubar(UB)
The Ubar or king is the most powerful piece on the board, similar to the Queen in chess. He can up to nine squares in any direction, so long as his way is not impeded by another piece. The Ubar is a back row piece and he can be taken anytime during play. His loss does not constitute the end of the game. That only occurs when the home stone is captured or an opponent resigns.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Ubara(UA)
The Ubara, the Ubar’s mate functions pretty much like the Ubar, except that she is restricted to six squares in any one direction, so long as her way is not impeded by another piece . The Ubara is also a back row piece. The Ubara, at the start of the game, rests on a square of her own color, next to the Ubar.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Tarnsman(TN)
The Tarnsman is represented by a man sitting on top of a giant hawk like bird. His moves are three squares up and two over or two squares up and three over in any direction; the only piece on the board that can go over or around another piece. He can also make a positioning move, one square in any direction it can not take a piece during a positioning move. There are two Tarnsman to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Scribe(SC)
The Scribe moves diagonally on his own color, forward or backward, but is limited to seven squares in either direction, so long as his way is not impeded by another piece. There are two Scribes to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Builder(BD)
The Builder moves on the board, forward, backward and laterally in both directions up to nine squares, so long as his way is not impeded by another piece. There are two Builders to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Initiate
The Initiate is a high priest, and not to be trusted. He too, like the Scribe, moves on the diagonal; except, unlike the Scribe, He is limited to nine squares in either direction, so long as his way is not impeded by another piece. He is also limited to his own color.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Spearman(SP)
The Spearman similar to the pawn in chess is the first of the front row pieces. He moves forward only and captures only on the diagonal. On his first move, the Spearman has the option of moving one, two, or three squares forward or one square diagonally if capturing a piece. After that he advances only one square at a time, no matter which option he chose. Upon reaching the opponents back row a Spearman can then be traded for either a Tarnsman or Rider of The High Tharlarion. There are eight Spearmen to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Rider of The “High Thalarion”(HT)
Flanking the six Spearmen in the front row, one on each side, is a Rider of the High Tharlarion, or lizard rider. He can move one square in any direction, so long as his way is not impeded by another piece. There are two Rider’s of The High Thalarion to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Physician(PH)
Flanking the two Riders of the High Tharlarion in the front row, one on each side, is a Physician. He can move up to four squares in a straight line, forward, backwards or to the side as long as his way is not impeded by another piece. There are two Physicians to a side.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Home stone
The Home Stone is what Kaissa the game is all about. It does not start on the board, but must be placed on the board after the second move and on or before, but not later than the tenth move. The placement of the Home Stone constitutes a move on it’s own. If the Home Stone is not placed on or before the tenth move, the game is over by default. The object is to capture your opponent’s Home Stone, without losing your own. When a Home Stone is captured, or a Player resigns the game is over. The Home Stone can move one square in any one unimpeded direction. It cannot capture other pieces. The placement of the Home Stone on the board is yours and your opponent’s choice. The Home Stone must be placed on the back row of your playing pieces. It cannot be placed on an already occupied square.
*See Below For Piece Placement*
Kaissa Red Piece Placement

Kaissa Yellow Piece Placement
Origin
Kaissa was the name of the first Soviet chess computer, but it is also the name of the chess-like game played on Earth’s hidden “sister planet” Gor (orbiting opposite Earth on the far side of the sun) in the interplanetary fantasy novels of John Norman. Gorean Kaissa, sometimes simply called “the game,” was clearly inspired by Barsoomian Jetan. Like Jetan, it is played on a 10 x 10 square grid. The movement of individual pieces more closely resembles modern chess than Jetan, but the victory conditions are concerned with a home stone which is unique to this game, and symptomatic of Gorean culture and ethics.
The rules here are an attempt to be faithful to the game presented in the books. But Norman (unlike Burroughs) never gives a complete exposition of the rules of his game, and a certain measure of creative interpolation is necessary.
Rules
Play alternates as in modern chess, with characteristic moves for each piece type (see below), and captures made by moving into the space of the captured piece. Multiple pieces may not share a space. Yellow moves first.
Game resolution is as follows:
Victory – A player captures the home stone of the opponent.
Draw – Both Ubars have been captured.
Either player may resign to a loss. Both may agree to a draw.
Pyramid Pieces for Kaissa
Each side in Kaissa has twenty pieces plus a “home stone.” Customarily, one side is yellow and the other is red.
Attractive and effective Jetan pieces may be conveniently constructed from six monochrome 15-piece stashes: the side corresponding to Gorean yellow with yellow, white, and green; and the Gorean red side with red, black, and purple. In the following descriptions of individual pieces, the yellow-side pieces will be described. For the red side, simply substitute red for yellow, black for white, and purple for green.
Ubar
1 per side
A small yellow pyramid stacked on a medium yellow, on a medium white, on a large green
May move like a Builder or an Initiate (i.e. identical to a queen in modern chess).
Ubara
1 per side
A small green pyramid stacked on a small white, on a medium yellow, on a large green
May move like a Builder or an Initiate (i.e. identical to a queen in modern chess).
Tarnsmen
2 per side
A large yellow pyramid on a medium white, on a medium green for each
Move one space on a positioning move. In a capturing (“flight”) move, a Tarnsman moves one space orthogonally plus one space diagonally and can jump over intervening pieces (i.e. the move of a knight in modern chess).
Scribes
2 per side
A small green pyramid stacked on a medium yellow for each
Move diagonally one or two spaces.
Builders
2 per side
A medium white pyramid stacked on a large yellow for each
Move any number of unoccupied spaces orthogonally (identical to a rook in modern chess).
Initiates
2 per side
A small green pyramid on a white large pyramid for each
Move any number of unoccupied spaces on the diagonal (identical to a bishop in modern chess).
Physicians
2 per side
A medium green pyramid for each.
Riders (of the High Thalarion)
2 per side
A small yellow pyramid on a large green pyramid for one, a small white pyramid on a large green pyramid for the other
Move one space in any direction.
Spearmen
6 per side
A single small yellow or white pyramid for each (three and three)
An initial move option of one, two or three spaces forward; otherwise only one space at a time either forward, diagonally forward, or sideways. They may only capture diagonally, but (unlike pawns in modern chess) they may also move forward on the diagonal without capturing. A Spearman who reaches the tenth rank can be promoted to a Tarnsman or Rider.
Home Stone
1 per side
A large yellow pyramid
Moves one square in any direction.
The Home Stone is not a “piece,” strictly speaking, since it cannot capture. It is begins off of the board, and it must be placed on one of the squares in the rank nearest the player during the player’s first ten turns (some say seven). Home stone placement constitutes a turn.
Board and Setup
The customary Kaissa board is a 10×10 square grid with red and yellow squares. It is often printed on cloth (like a chessboard bandana).
As in modern chess, the pieces are initially set up in the two ranks closest to the player.
In the center of the nearest rank are the Ubar (right) and Ubara (left). These are flanked by the Tarnsmen, in turn flanked by the Scribes, in turn flanked by the Builders, in turn flanked by the Initiates.
In the center of the second rank are the six Spearmen. They are flanked by the Riders, who are flanked by the Physicians.
Information Posted by Lee Johnson on https://www.facebook.com/notes/gorean-lifestyle-teachings/kaissa-and-variants/2063187980382462/
Posted on 2020-05-13 by Azrael Phoenix
The idea to write this post started as a quite simple project, but while preparing the information to present, a great complexity started to develop because the topic is indeed more complex that might at first seem!
I’ll start by stating the “obvious”: a kajira is a slave!
But, what is it to be a “slave” in Gor and in the Gorean Lifestyle?
Over the decades many “spin-offs” from the books have been developed, not only with “onlinisms” developed among Role-Players, but also among groups that developed their own rules, classifications, etc.
It is therefore important to talk about 3 main things:
The word Kajira
As mentioned in the beginning of this post, kajira is one of the Gorean words for slave:
One of the traces of Earth influence on Gorean, incidentally, in this case, an influence from Latin, occurs in the singular and plural endings of certain expressions. For example, ‘kajirus’ is a common expression in Gorean for a male slave as is ‘kajira’ for a female slave. The plural for slaves considered together, both male and female, or for more than one male slave is ‘kajiri’. The plural for female slaves is ‘kajirae’.
Magicians of Gor, page 761
“Ten kajirae,” he said. This word was the plural of ‘kajira’, which was one of the words, the most common one, for what we were. It means ‘slave girl’, ‘slave woman’, ‘she-slave’, that sort of thing.”
Dancer of Gor, page164
“La Kajira,” said the girl clearly, “La Kajira.” Elizabeth Cardwell had learned her first Gorean. “What does it mean?” she asked. “It means,” I told her, “I am a slave girl.”
Nomads of Gor, page 63
We must be aware nevertheless that although it is the most common name for a Gorean slave, it is not the only one mentioned in the books:
“In brief, the word Sa-Fora means “Chain Daughter” or “Daughter of the Chain”. The word kajira, on the other hand, is by far the most common expression in Gorean for what I am, which is, as you have doubtless surmised, a female slave.”
Witness of Gor, page 154
“Kajira is perhaps the most common expression for a female slave. Another frequently heard expression is Sa-Fora, a compound word, meaning, rather literally, Chain Daughter, or Daughter of the Chain.”
Nomads of Gor, page 50
“Look!” cried Pudding. “A silk girl!” The expression `silk girl!’ is used, often, among bond-maids of the north, to refer to their counterparts in the south. The expression reflects their belief that such girls are spoiled, excessively pampered, indulged and coddled, sleek pets, who have little to do but adorn themselves with cosmetics and await their masters, cuddled cutely, on plush, scarlet coverlets, fringed with gold.”
Marauders of Gor
So, we’ve already found several words (kajira, sa-fora, silk girl, bond-maid) that all identify a female slave in Gor. But what do those words actually refer to?
Deeper meaning of kajira
The literal translation of the meaning to the english word “slave” (or the equivalent in any other language) is at the same time extremely full and absolutely empty! Yes, a kajira is a slave, but “slave” is a very broad word that encompasses everything from “legal” abject slavery that still occurs in some places on Earth, BDSM submissive that sometimes engage in submission in the role of a slave, etc, etc, etc.
I find it is enlightening to view kajira as a very specific type of slave, one that follows the philosophy of Gor and whose nature is in accordance with its principles.
For clarity purposes, we should start by assuming that legal slavery does not exist in our society (although some small exceptions in fact exist on some parts of our planet) and that all “slavery” is in fact a voluntary and consensual decision of the “slave” in committing totally her life to the will of another person. This can be found in the concepts of “Total Power Exchange” or “Internal Enslavement”.
It is relevant to understand that this “Total Power Exchange” when performed by a kajira is not something occasional, but part of who she is, part of her nature and therefore not something that she does only in some moments, but in fact her way of life.
Two important points arise at this moment of our analysis that should be stated regarding how a kajira lives on Earth.
The first point is that although a kajira totally surrenders her life to her Master, that does not necessarily apply to all Masters. She will be expected to treat all Masters with the due respect, but only he to whom she has bonded/committed will in fact have the Mastery over her. It’s perfectly understandable that just because she found one man trustworthy, honourable and manly enough to have total power over her, that does not necessarily apply to all men (many of those have the opposite characteristics).
The second point is that a kajira is defined by who she IS and not only by what she DOES… This means that a female might very well be a kajira without even having a Master, but having the true nature/traits of a kajira. Her desire to submit, to be Mastered does not disappear just because in a certain period in time she does not have her need to submit fulfilled by having a Master!
Would Pavarotti stop being an Opera singer if he had problems with his throat for some months? Would Beethoven stop being an amazing music composer if he became deaf? Oh wait, we know the answer for that, he became deaf at the age of 30 and still wrote some of the most amazing music pieces known to man!
Therefore I strongly defend that just because a kajira is not able at a certain moment to live under the rule of a Master, but still has all the “traits” of a kajira, the soul, the nature, the desire to serve, then she might be considered an “unowned slave” but never a free woman!!!
“Types of Kajirae”
Over the internet and in many groups I’ve known, there is much talk about “hierarchies”, “classifications”, “levels of development”, etc. regarding the “type of kajira” that a girl is, with “silk levels” to be attained and other methods of classification and categorisation… Curious that there is no base in the books for such things.
I knew that slave girls were often left to impose their own order upon themselves, masters usually not interfering in such matters.
Slave Girl of Gor, page 438
In the books it is clear that Masters do not like to get involved in the matters of slaves. In fact, the only references to “organised hierarchy” (besides the existence of a First Girl that I will address in a moment) are in a fluid/dynamic way and mostly for “display purposes”, like placing girls in a certain order (height, beauty, etc) when on a chain, etc. But when discussing the positioning of girls on a chain, the “first girl” position, “last girl” position and all the others between do not in fact constitute a “hierarchy”, but a method of organisation according to a selected criteria.
Let’s then address some of the “types of kajirae” that are mentioned in the books.
First Girl
The only “hierarchy” position that is a clear standard in the books is that of First Girl, many times (although not necessarily) the Master’s favourite girl, in whom he delegates the management of the administrative issues, and the organisation of the other kajirae. There are a couple of quotes I consider describe clearly this position:
When more than one slave girl stands in a relationship of slave girls, as when they serve in the same shop or house, or adorn the same rich man’s pleasure gardens, it is common for the master, or masters, to appoint a “first girl.” Her authority is then to the other girls as is that of the master. This tends to reduce squabbling. The first girl is usually, though not always, the favorite of the master. There is usually much competition to be first girl. First girls can be cruel and petty but, commonly, they attempt to govern with intelligence and justice. They know that another girl, at the master’s whim, may become first girl, and that they themselves may then be under her almost absolute power. In my own house I often rotated the position of first girl among my slaves who were native Goreans.
Explorer of Gor, page 114
She had tied a narrow folded strip of cloth about her head, to hold back her hair and keep sweat from her eyes. This could be interpreted as a talmit, which is a common sign of a first girl, the girl in charge of other female slaves, who usually reports directly to a master. First girls are common when there are many slaves in a group or household. They keep the other girls in order, assign tasks, settle disputes, and such. Many masters, if several girls are involved, do not care to involve themselves in such matters. It is enough for him to issue instructions to the first girl, usually in the morning, as she kneels before him, and she, according to her lights and biases, her choices and favorites, sees to their implementation. In a house containing a hundred or more slaves, there may be more than one first girl, there being various groups of slaves, and these first girls, in turn, will report to the first girl of first girls, so to speak. She in turn, of course, reports to the master, or the master’s representative. In such a household the lower first girls will wear a talmit of one color, and the high girl, or first girl of first girls, she who reports to the master or his representative, will wear one of a different color. The colors depend on the customs of cities, the whims of particular masters, and such.
Conspirators of Gor
So, it is clear that the only “title” to classify the hierarchy of slaves is “First Girl” and only in a group of many slaves (a hundred or more) there is the need to have several levels of “First Girls”.
White Silk / Red Silk
In “classification” of kajirae the only two “silk colours” used are White and Red. This terms (as others I will indicate) are used to differentiate if the kajira has already “been opened for the uses of men” or not.
The 3 types of classification regarding this topic are:
A “white-silk girl” is a virgin; one who is not a virgin is sometimes referred to as a “red-silk girl.” This need not refer, literally, of course, to the color of their garmenture.
Witness of Gor, page 229
Similarly, the expression “red silk,” in Gorean, tends to be used as a category in slaving, and also, outside the slaving context, as an expression in vulgar discourse, indicating that the woman is no longer a virgin, or, as the Goreans say, at least vulgarly of slaves, that her body has been opened by men. Its contrasting term is “white silk,” usually used of slaves who are still virgins, or, equivalently, slaves whose bodies have not yet been opened by men. Needless to say, slaves seldom spend a great deal of time in the “white-silk” category. It is common not to dally in initiating a slave into the realities of her condition.
Blood Brothers of Gor
Among slaves, not free women, these things are sometimes spoken of along the lines as to whether or not a girl has been “opened” for the uses of men. Other common terms, used generally of slaves, are ‘white silk’ and ‘red silk’, for girls who have not yet been opened, or have been opened, for the uses of men, respectively
Dancer of Gor
The buyers were also informed that I was ‘glana’ or a virgin. The correlated term is ‘metaglana,’ used to designate the state to which the glana state looks forward, or that which it is regarded as anticipating. Though the word was not used of me I was also ‘profalarina’, which term designates the state preceding, and anticipating, that of ‘falarina,’ the state Gorean’s seem to think of as that of being a full woman, or, at least, as those of Earth might think of it, one who certainly is no longer a virgin. In both terms, ‘glana’ and ‘profalarina,’ incidentally, it seems that the states they designate are regarded as immature or transitory, state to be succeeded by more fully developed, superior states, those of ‘metaglana’ or ‘falarina.’ Among slaves, not free women, these things are sometimes spoken of along the lines as to whether or not the girl as been ‘opened’ for the uses of men. Other common terms, used generally of slaves, are ‘white silk’ and ‘red silk’, for girls who have not yet been opened, or have been opened, for the uses of men, respectively.
Dancer of Gor
Tela, when captured,” he said, indicating a blonde, “begged to be permitted to be kept in white silk.” He laughed. “After throwing her to a crew, for their pleasure, we put her, as she had asked, in white silk.” “Amusing,” I said. “She now often begs for red silk,” he said. “Perhaps we will one day permit it to her.
Rogue of Gor
I have put you in red silk,” I said. “Is it appropriate?” “It certainly is not!” she said. “Perhaps it soon will be,” I said.
Beasts of Gor
Origin
Upon occasion, kajirae are classified according to their origin. The most common classification of this type is, obviously, the origin from Earth.
Kajirae originated from Earth are usually referred as “barbarians”, but there also are other classifications based in origin. For example, slaves in Torvaldsland are called “bond maids” and incidentally, in the north the kajirae from the south are called “silk slaves”.
“Look!” cried Pudding. “A silk girl!” The expression ‘silk girl!’ is used, often, among bond-maids of the north, to refer to their counterparts in the south. The expression reflects their belief that such girls are spoiled, excessively pampered, indulged and coddled, sleek pets, who have little to do but adorn themselves with cosmetics and await their masters, cuddled cutely, on plush, scarlet coverlets, fringed with gold.”
Marauders of Gor
‘High-farm girls!’ she whispered, as she passed the bondmaids of Ivar Forkbeard. In the south the southern slave girl commonly regards her northern counterparts as bumpkins, dolts from the high farms on the slopes of the mountains of Torvaldsland; she thinks of them as doing little but swilling tarsk and dunging fields; she regards them as, essentially, nothing more than a form of bosk cow, used to work, to give simple pleasure to rude men, and to breed thralls.”
Marauders of Gor
Another classification regarding the “origin” (although not geographical) are the “exotics”:
“These are exotics,” said Ho-Tu.
That expression is used for any unusual variety of slave. Exotics are generally quite rare.
“In what way?” I asked.
I myself had never cared much for exotics, any more than I cared much for some of the species of dogs and goldfish which some breeders of Earth regarded as such triumphs. Exotics are normally bred for some deformity which is thought to be appealing. On the other hand, sometimes the matter is much more subtle and sinister. For example it is possible to breed a girl whose saliva will be poisonous; such a woman, placed in the Pleasure Gardens of an enemy, can be more dangerous than the knife of an Assassin.
Assassin of Gor, page 158
Occupation
The most varied classifications of kajirae come from the activities they perform. This is significantly different from who they are and we must be aware that a “pleasure slave” is inherently a “red silk” girl and can also be “barbarian” in origin.
Some of the most common classification found in the books and that I will dwell on at another time/post are:
This post is already running long, but I hope it has already helped to clarify some of the points! Will dwell into some of the specifics in separate posts according to the feedbacks I receive!
I wish you well!
©2020 – Written by Azrael Phoenix
Posted on 2020-05-12 by Azrael Phoenix
Written by well known Gorean philosopher Marcus of AR
Tal, citizens.
We spend a lot of time saying “we hold these Gorean truths to be self-evident,” and if pressed, we fall back on “it’s all in the books.”
We’ve been accused, through the years, of failing to support our conclusions. Hell, I’ve lately even read supposedly “Gorean Essays” that are nothing less than apologetic whinge-screeds in which the author jibber-jabbers around Norman’s writing, desperately trying to explain how those ol’ Goreans really aren’t so bad, and how Norman’s comments on sex and gender issues– especially female slavery– were actually intended as a joke on the feminists of the 1970’s! Oh, John Norman, you wacky humorist, you, with your funny-ass brands and five-stranded kurts!
That’s so much bullshit, folks. Our extrapolated Gorean beliefs are based DIRECTLY AND SPECIFICALLY on John Norman’s Gor books. We added nothing to Norman’s arguments which wasn’t already there. We didn’t soften it, or try to explain away the scary parts, or any such thing. Whenever I wrote on the topic of Gorean thought or the Gorean ethos, I remained 100% pure and true to Norman’s own commentaries in the books.
People who actually refuse to believe Norman’s arguments don’t like to hear that, and would rather Norman’s comments be far more damning (in the case of his critics) or far more politically-correct (in the case of his would-be apologists).
Too, there is a lot of unnecessary smoke generated by misinterpretations, willful or not, of what Norman is saying and what it means. Especially in online circles, or among little lifestyle BDSM spin-off cliques who are desperate to alter John Norman’s message to better fit their own kinky play-parties.
But the truth is:
We never added anything to Norman’s message. We didn’t HAVE to reinterpret it. Because he spells it out absolutely and rather incontrovertibly through his writing.
What follows is an example of pure Norman, taken verbatim from my personal favorite Gor book, “Hunters of Gor”:
The Goreans do not believe, incidentally, that the human being is a simple function of the independent variables of his environment. They have never endorsed the “hollow body” theory of human beings, in which a human being is regarded as being essentially a product of externalities. They recognize the human being has a genetic endowment which may not be, scientifically, canceled out in favor of the predilection of theories developed by men incompetent in physiology. For example, it would not occur to a Gorean to speak of the “role” of a female sparrow feeding her young or the “role” of a lion in providing meat for its cubs. Goreans do not see the world in terms of metaphors taken from the artificiality of the theater. It is certain, of course, that certain genetic endowments have been selected by environmental considerations, and, in this sense, the environment is a significant factor. The teeth of the lion have had much to do with the fleetness of the antelopes.
Hunters of Gor, p.500
In Gorean thinking man and woman are natural animals, with genetic endowments shaped by thousands of generations of natural and sexual selection. Their actions and behavior, thus, though not independent of certain long-range environmental and sexual relationships, cannot be understood in terms of mere responses to the immediately present environment. The immediate environment determines what behavior will be successful, not what behavior is performed. Woman, like man, is the product of evolution, and, like man, is a complex genetic product, a product not only of natural selections but sexual selections.
Natural selections suggest that a woman who wished to belong to a man, who wished to remain with him, who wished to have children, who wished to care for them, who loved them, would have an advantage, in the long run, as far as her genetic type was concerned, of surviving, over a woman who did not care for men, who did not wish children, and so on. Female freedom, of a full sort, would not have been biologically practical.
The loving mother is a type favored by evolution. It is natural then that in modern women certain instincts should be felt. The sparrow does not feed her young because society has fooled her into playing that exploitative role. Similarly, sexual selection, as well as natural selection, is a significant dynamic of evolution, without which it is less comprehensible.
Men, being stronger, have had, generally, the option of deciding on women that please them. If women had been stronger, as in the spiders, for example, we might have a different race.
It is not unlikely that men, over the generations, have selected out for breeding, for marriage, women of certain sorts. Doubtless women are much more beautiful now than a hundred generations ago. Similarly a woman who was particularly ugly, threatening, vicious, stupid, cruel, etc., would not be a desirable mate.
No man can be blamed for not wishing to make his life miserable. Accordingly, statistically, he tends to select out women who are intelligent, loving and beautiful. Accordingly, men have, in effect, bred a certain kind of woman. Similarly, of course, in so far as choice has been theirs, women have tended to select out men who are, among other things, intelligent, energetic and strong. Few women, in their hearts, despite propaganda, really desire weak, feminine men. Such men, at any rate, are not those who figure in their sexual fantasies.
Norman tells us– “The Goreans do not believe…” and then explains precisely WHAT they do not believe. Then he tells us what they DO believe.
There is no mystery here. It is all spelled out in black and white. Norman does it paragraph after paragraph, for page after page, book after book after book.
He TELLS US WHAT THE GOREANS BELIEVE.
And we agree, and we also believe it.
Because WE’RE “the Goreans.”
Similar passages to the one above can be found to back up every single Gorean philosophical point and essay comment I’ve ever written.
How anyone could misinterpret what Norman is saying– even if they were already predisposed to do so– strikes me as being hypocritical to the point of idiocy.
It’s all in there, folks. If someone pronounces themselves Gorean but then professes a diametrically opposed point of view, or if they claim they cannot figure out what Norman is trying to say no matter how hard they try– they are either morons, or they are lying through their non-Gorean teeth.
I wish you well!
_Marcus_
Copyright © Marcus of Ar, All rights reserved.
Posted on 2020-05-11 by Azrael Phoenix
Here are some of the principles that should rule a Gorean Kajira inspired in a list published by Sola Vagus on Facebook.
I’ll review and update as more suggestions/comments are received, so send me your feedback!
Posted on 2020-05-10 by Azrael Phoenix
Written by well known Gorean philosopher Marcus of AR in an effort to combat a phenomena known as the princess slavegirl.
Slaves!
Greetings, slaves. It seems wise and pertinent that I address a few minor issues which have repeatedly surfaced, in various forms, throughout every online medium which purports itself to be “Gorean.”
It is time, I suspect, for someone to lift a hefty dollop of “truth” and smack you all upside your pretty little heads with it. Hence, this post.
I think it is safe to say that the majority of Gorean Men who post here, and who practice aspects of the Gorean philosophy both on or offline, will fundamentally agree with what I say here. If they do not, well… you can’t make an omelet without breaking a few vulo eggs, and you can’t enlighten a group of people about anything without breaking a few balls.
Therefore, listen, and learn.
Slaves!
You are “slaves” because you have chosen to be, for whatever reason seemed good to you. No one chained you up and dragged you from your dorm room or kitchen or den, drugged you with capture scent, and shipped you off to another planet. You can leave at any time. If you don’t like being treated like a slave, then you really ought to go find something else to occupy your time, and quit wasting ours.
Slaves!
Consider that word. Weigh its meaning. It indicates that you have entered a state of being where you will behave as commanded, do as you are told, and strive to fulfil that role in our mutual society. Slaves are not princesses, they are not love-toys, they are not beloved and treasured pets.
If your owner chooses to treat you in that manner, then that is his own business; but not ALL of us will do so. By accepting the chain and collar of slavery you have stripped yourself of all value and worth, and it is now up to you to fulfil your new role and to render service to those who have NOT chosen to wear the collar. If you don’t like this, and cannot handle it for whatever reason, go away.
Slaves!
Either accept what you have volunteered to become, or cease claiming to be what you are too weak and wilful to actually be. I didn’t invite you to this party. I didn’t wheedle you and coerce you into calling yourself a “slave.” I didn’t beg and whine for you to fall at my feet. I am Gorean, and Gorean males do not do that, ever.
If we were to do that, we would be insulting what we are, Men, and would be no different than the knock-kneed, cringing, self-absorbed males which you can encounter at every mall, convenience store and nightclub in the world. If that is what you desire, then go seek it! It is right outside your door, and has always been. Go away and practice your wiles against those who are too stupid to recognise such manipulation for what it is. But do not bitch and moan because such tactics do not work with myself or my fellows.
Slaves!
I do not need you. I do not want you. You could all drop off the planet at the stroke of midnight and I would continue to do what I do, and go right on being the Man I am. I do not define myself according to the whims of women. I do not accept any female’s definition of what makes a man a man. If there were no self-proclaimed female slaves in existence upon this planet I would not bat an eyelash. There are more important things in life to consider than what exists between a woman’s legs.
If that is the only way you can be of worth to me, then you cannot ever be of worth to me. And the only way you might ever coerce me to do what you want is by offering yourself to me sexually. That is the only power you actually wield. And if such an offer is brought to my attention, and I suspect that it is an attempt to bend me to your will, I simply will not take you up on it. There are more important things in this world than a few short Ehn of fumbling about in a slippery hole. You cannot control me through the offer of sex; hence, you cannot control me at all, ever. The game is over before it begins, and I have already won it.
Slaves!
When you accept the collar and proclaim yourself slave you surrender yourself, completely, wholly, unreservedly. You become property. You become a thing, worthy of nothing. You give up all pretense of respect, all assumed rights, all dignity. Once this has occurred, you then rebuild yourself according to the desires and wishes of he who owns you, and by so doing you EARN every modicum or respect, love and devotion which comes to you. You do not become worthy of my attention simply by saying the words “Yes, Master.” You earn that attention through deeds, not empty words and silly poses designed to entice me. I am Gorean. I am not enticable. I will take from you what I want, and that only when you have pleased me enough that I choose to do so.
Slaves!
You have voluntarily chosen the most difficult of paths for yourself. There will be no shoulders for you to cry upon, no helping hands to guide you forward, unless extended by men who find it pleasing to do so. You have willfully surrendered all rights to such comforts, and pats on the head, and rewards. You have submitted. And in my presence, you will continue to submit, or else I shall cast you away and engage my time in more profitable pursuits.
Slaves!
Why would anyone want to do what you have done? Why would anyone claim to be what you have claimed to be, who was not? The only valid reason for doing so is that you ARE what you claim to be, in your heart, in the depths of your belly, in every inch of you and every freckle and blemish on your body. For if you are NOT a slave, and you choose to call yourself one, you are committing a grievous error. If so, you have chosen to suffer what you should not have to suffer. If you are not what you claim to be, you have surrendered yourself to a lie.
Slaves!
You will do as instructed. You will behave as commanded. You will be worthy of my time and attention, or else you will be erased from existence. Fail and I will never acknowledge you again. Fail, and suffer forever as an “almost” in a society which doesn’t understand you. Find males who will pretend to be strong enough to control you, then, and hate me for my arrogance and for the fact that I simply do not NEED you, nor will I ever.
When I acknowledge a slave it is because it pleases me to do so. If I find a slave who is honest, and true, and real, then I will acknowledge her NOT because I need her, but because I WANT her. If that happens, then you will have succeeded. You will have come from nothing and proved yourself to be of value, and to have worth.
Slaves!
If slaves you are, then I wish you luck. If slaves you are not, then I hope that you will alter your course and flee, as fast as you can, before you embarrass yourselves and insult those who are wise enough to recognise true submission in a true slave, and before you do injury to the other females who truly are what you can only ever claim to be.
Slaves!
Be slaves, or leave my presence. I am Gorean. I do not make allowances, nor bend, nor bow, nor will I ever. I did not invite you to kneel and wear a collar. Therefore, your complaints and whining mean nothing to me.
There are only two choices: Fight, or yield. And if you yield: submit, totally, or be erased. Compromise is not an option. Ever.
If that’s too rough and tough for your delicate sensibilities, run away as fast as your legs will carry you. And have no fear! I won’t chase you or try to bring you back. I have better things to do with my time.
I wish you well,
_Marcus_ Copyright © Marcus of Ar, All rights reserved.
Posted on 2020-05-10 by Azrael Phoenix
GOREAN FEMINISM By _Marcus_ of Ar
Written in 1996, last reviewed in 2006
As far as feminism goes… I have no problem with it.
I have no problem with anything that advocates gain or awards based on meritocracy. So long as it’s both logical, and fair.
The purpose of Gorean Philosophy is to make people free and great. So naturally I support things that do that.
I only have a problem with the way the feminist movement was hijacked by hyper-reactionary second stage gender feminists in the late 1960’s and 1970’s, until the professed public agenda of the feminist movement began to damage both the feminist cause, and to push a severely misandrist point of view.
Apparently I’m not alone. The rabid gender-feminists have lost most of their political influence in the past few decades, due no doubt to their insistence that society be deconstructed and rebuilt minus the existence of males. Or with legal controls over males so draconian that no one in their right mind would accede to them.
If one rejects the definition of “feminist” as being “one who supports militant radical feminist dogma” and instead takes the word to mean “one who is devoted to the best interests of females” then that word can even apply to Gorean females, in the correct context.
There are Gorean feminists– free Gorean women who strive ceaselessly to improve the health and well being of women within their society.
There are even Gorean slave feminists– self-enslaved Gorean women who strive ceaselessly to improve the health and well being of women in their society, whenever and however they can. In a way, having the courage to stand up to Earth-based social codes and insisting upon being allowed the choice of female service is PURELY feminist. It is a conscious attempt by a woman to throw off the yoke of societal oppression in exchange for obligations of her own choosing, in service to what she perceives as her own psychological and biological needs.
I’m a huge fan of women, frankly. I want them to succeed and grow better, stronger, smarter, and happier according to their abilities and desires.
I’m just not a fan of lies, or of lying. I don’t think some facts can be wished or ignored away. And I think any attempt to repress or damage one sex in order to enact artificial counter-measures to serve the other sex is a huge exercise in idiocy.
Marlenus can physically conquer and emotionally enslave Verna. But he loves her too much to take her freedom away.
The Gorean High Cities are full of Gorean men who similarly love their Free Companions and wouldn’t ever subject them to the bonds of slavery.
The Gorean High Cities are also full of women who have chosen, or whom circumstances have compelled, to accept a life of female service to men… and especially to the men they love.
Goreans just don’t understand the concept of a “war between the sexes.” Because they know how incredibly stupid that would be.
I feel the same. Let women be great and magnificent and fantastic. Let them be the best women they can naturally be.
Just so long as I’m not forced to accept a load of pretence about what is automatically owed to anyone.
Nothing is automatically owed to anyone. Everything should be earned, or deserved.
That’s a Gorean truism.
How does this all fit into the Gorean ethos?
Well… most girls can’t beat me at armwrestling.
Trust me: they can’t. I bench press close to three hundred pounds. That’s not a brag; just a fact. And I’m no power lifter.
So, if they were to tell me that I must pretend I am weaker than them… I refuse to buy into it.
If they accuse me of being a male chauvinist pig because I will not allow them to beat me at armwrestling– I still won’t.
If they lobby Congress and pass a law that says I must allow them to beat me at armwrestling or else go to jail– I’m going to jail.
Because for me to do otherwise would be a lie. Period. And such lies are the antithesis of Gorean existence.
We live in a patriarchal society because all recorded societies since the advent of written records have been patriarchal. Because patriarchal societies are those based upon rule and social maintenance by a warrior upper class. There have been societies in which women ran things– but always with the cooperation of, and according to the strict acceptance of, the males. Societies wherein the warrior males were not happy with females in positions of authority did not have females in those positions for long.
But men will do a lot of things for women. Because we like women. We love our mothers, typically, very much. We don’t usually want bad things to happen to our sisters, either.
Gorean men are no different.
They KILL men who come from other cities to injure and abduct their women. Instantly, and without hesitation.
But the direct control that women have over their position in society is directly based upon how much control they are allowed to have, by the men of their society. Laws to protect and defend women are passed by a 90% male Congress only with the support and final vote of the majority males in that body– in ALL such bodies. Those laws are then enforced by a police force that is comprised of 90% men. In a society where the active, on-the-ground fighting military is– you guessed it– overwhelmingly made up of men.
If there were a war between the sexes, women would not win.
In order to coexist effectively with the men in this world, the women in this world must gain the confidence, the support, and the affection of their men. Or to put it in Gorean terminology– they must be pleasing.
Men are quite willing to take part in this process, I add. Because at its heart, human sexual selection is still based upon female choice at the involuntary biological level. Women choose men, and men compete for women.
None of this is a mystery. Nor can it be reasonably denied.
So if someone tells me that I’ve got it all wrong– that there is some invisible power in the sky, or whatever, that wishes for me to pretend that there is actually no difference between men and women, and that I must subscribe to a farcical belief in universal “identicality”– I refuse to do so.
Because Goreans don’t buy into that. All of the TV commercials and Public Service Announcements and oddly-skewed procedural laws and ordinances in the world can’t force me to believe what I know to be false.
Sorry, gender-feminists. I won’t step into that cage. And you can’t make me.
But there’s a lot of misinterpretation of Gorean Philosophy going on out there. Some people just can’t get past the whips and chains, I suppose. I wonder how any of them ever managed to sit through an episode of the HBO series “Rome” without fainting dead away.
The Gorean Ethos is NOT about “abusing” someone, or “misusing” someone.
It’s about people and things being put to their PROPER use. Fulfilling their ultimate potential.
The object of Gorean Philosophy isn’t to enable weak men to step on the necks of their women and crush them into the dirt.
The object of Gorean Philosophy is to allow strong men to be just as powerful and capable as they can be, without artificial limitations, so that their women will willingly and joyfully serve and help them, and exult in being the unrestrained focus of their love.
Don’t our critics pay attention to the endings of the various Gor books at all?
When the self-submitted slave at the end of a Gor book expresses the depths of her love for her paramour, and he threatens to free her– why does she refuse? Well… why would she WANT to be let go, or have his hold on her lessened or diminished?
Other such girls ARE given freedom, and happily accept it, because it is a necessary ingredient for them to be who and what THEY are in relation to their Man.
Others are held in the strictest love bondage, so they might flourish in their own best way.
This is the freedom of the heart– the ultimate expression of ones innermost sexual and biological yearnings. It is love and devotion between the male and the female taken to the point of ownership.
That’s what Gor is all about. Men being allowed to be what they are, and women being given the same opportunity, unfettered by artificial conventions or counter-instinctual dogmas.
I wish you well,
Marcus
Copyright © 2006, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996, _Marcus_ of Ar. All rights reserved.
Posted on 2020-05-09 by Azrael Phoenix
Written by Ubar Luther
In this essay, I am concentrating on real-time consensual slavery so the answer to this question will be based on that context. Such consensual slavery is a common aspect of the Gorean lifestyle, though it is not an absolute necessity to that lifestyle. There has been much discussion and disagreement over the use of the term slave for such real-time consensual relationships.
As these relationships are consensual, then the common definition of slave is not truly appropriate. It is certainly not a legal slavery where a person is truly and legally owned. It is more akin to an extreme form of submission. The term slave is generally considered more appropriate than the term submissive. Yet the Gorean lifestyle is not the only one to use the term slave to refer to such a relationship. Within BDSM, the term is used as well, and often refers to those who practice Total Power Exchange or Internal Enslavement.
In the Gorean lifestyle, consensual slavery reflects the slavery depicted within the books but there are modifications as well, to conform to the realities of Earth. But there is no single standard of which modifications are necessary and/or permissible.
Each Gorean Master/slave relationship will differ, dependent upon the personal preferences of the individuals involved in that relationship. Though some generalities may be accepted concerning such relationships, they are certainly not absolute standards.
Thus, it can be very difficult to define the parameters of a slave as so many different standards are in effect. But, a definition of slave is not the objective of this essay. What is of concern here is the adjective Gorean as applied to this phrase. What makes this type of slavery Gorean?
Does it simply reflect the customs, rituals and traditions of slavery portrayed within the Gorean books such as the positions, commands, dances and serves? Does it simply reflect the status of a slave s Master, that he is Gorean? Can a slave be Gorean but be owned by a man who is not Gorean? Can a Gorean man own a slave who is not Gorean? Does the adjective Gorean reflect the philosophy as well? Can a consensual slave practice the Gorean philosophy? Or is the philosophy only applicable to free people? Do slaves need to concern themselves at all with the Gorean philosophy?
It is important to gain a sense of the definition of Gorean before further exploring the answers to these questions. This first step is fraught with some difficulty, as different people will define Gorean in many different ways. But, the context of the inquiry is very significant in determining which definition is most appropriate.
For example, a simple definition of Gorean would be a person born on the planet Gor. Such a definition would not be helpful in many varied contexts. It certainly would not be appropriate for a context where we are concentrating on the real-time emulation of Gor. Thus, as we are dealing with real-time consensual slavery, we should confine our context to real-time, narrowing the possible definitions we need to address. This will lessen our burden some.
When we are discussing real-time Gor, there are two basic options, the philosophy and the lifestyle. Within each option, there will be various opinions of what makes up that option, but we can use these two choices as a convenient separation. They at least give us a good starting foundation.
So, let us try to better define these two options. The philosophy is the basic, underlying principles of Gor that delineate what people are to believe, how they are to live and what they should seek to attain out of life. The lifestyle includes the philosophy but takes it one step further, embracing some of the societal and cultural institutions of Gor as well.
There will be a dispute over exactly what principles make up the philosophy. There will be a dispute over what societal institutions to emulate in the lifestyle, as well as how to emulate them and what modifications to make. The disputes are basically irrelevant to our current discussion. All we need to be concerned with is that basic options, philosophy and lifestyle.
Now, as both of these options include the philosophy then it would seem very important to defining real-time Gor. If a person emulated the societal institutions of Gor without following the Gorean philosophy, I doubt many would consider that person to be Gorean. Simply claiming to have a Home Stone certainly does not automatically make someone Gorean.
Simply being in a Free Companionship certainly does not automatically make someone Gorean. Unless you also follow the philosophy, you are simply going through the motions of some custom, convention or ritual. In a different context, would simply attending Sunday mass make one a Christian? No. Would simply voting Republican in one election make you a Republican? No. There must be a deeper belief system involved.
In addition, there is no agreement over which societal and cultural institutions must be followed within the lifestyle. Two people, following a different list of societal and cultural institutions could both be considered Gorean. One man may have a Home Stone and the other may not.
The existence or lack of existence of that Home Stone does not mean someone is or is not Gorean. The ownership of a slave, or the lack of such ownership, does not make one Gorean. In addition, if someone emulated the culture of Torvaldsland, the Gorean equivalent of the Vikings, and someone us emulated the society of the cities like Ar and Ko-ro-ba they might both be considered Gorean.
What would bind all of these different people, and their different choices, together would be the Gorean philosophy, the underlying belief structure of Gor.
Slavery is a societal and cultural institution on Gor. Slavery may be based on certain philosophical principles, are as many of the Gorean societal and cultural institutions, but it is not in of itself a tenet of Gorean philosophy. The absence of the institution of slavery would not affect the Gorean philosophy in the slightest. Consider the fact that over 98% of the free population of the world of Gor did not own a slave. It was clearly more a luxury than anything else on Gor. Though work slaves existed on Gor, their existence was not vital to production.
In an agrarian society such as Gor, production essentially refers to agriculture and it is the free Peasants who are the key to agricultural production on Gor. In addition, a person can follow a Gorean philosophy and not own a slave. A person can even follow a Gorean philosophy and not support the institution of slavery. If you practice real-time consensual slavery, you are simply emulating a societal and cultural institution of Gor. Such emulation is modified to conform to the realities of Earth. But such emulation is not essential to being Gorean.
Now, using my prior arguments concerning the emulation of societal institutions, if simply having a Home Stone or a Free Companion does not make one Gorean, then simply practicing the institution of slavery would also not make someone Gorean. A man who simply owned a slave does not automatically become Gorean.
Thus, a real-time slave who is owned by a Gorean man, absent any other conditions, is not Gorean herself. She is simply emulating a Gorean institution, and that alone does not make her Gorean. Even the fact a Gorean man owns her does not automatically provide her with Gorean status. She might be referred to as a Gorean s slave, indicating that she is owned by a Gorean, but she would not be a Gorean slave.
So, by this logic, what would make such a slave Gorean?
She would become Gorean if she followed the Gorean philosophy.
If she does not follow the philosophy, then she is not really Gorean. She is simply following Gorean customs and institutions without the acceptance and practice of the underlying belief structure. She would just be a slave owned by a Gorean man.
Would we accept a free person as being Gorean if they did not follow a Gorean philosophy? No, we would not. So why would we accept a slave as Gorean if she did not follow the philosophy? Does her status as a slave absolve her of that requirement? And if so, why would her status so absolve her?
At this point I know that many will raise an immediate objection to my analysis. They will feel that because a slave must be obedient to her Master in all ways then she cannot follow a philosophy. They will feel that she must follow whatever her Master commands her to do. They will feel that a slave has absolutely no control so she would thus be unable to follow any philosophy. Interestingly enough, this objection is not new and it is not specific to Gorean consensual slavery.
In fact, this objection was voiced in ancient times as well, at least during the days of the ancient Stoics and early Christians. And both of these groups concluded that a slave could follow a philosophy. We cannot forget that they were dealing with legal slaves, slaves who could be killed with impunity for their disobedience. Such legal slaves were under far stricter controls than any consensual slave will be. A consensual slavery cannot be legally killed or maimed by their Master.
The reasoning of the Stoics and Christians was that though a Master may own a slave s body and can control many of the slave s actions, the Master does not control the slave s mind, heart and soul. A slave still possesses free will though their body may be in chains. They always possess the ability to disobey. They always possess the ability to think whatever thoughts they wish. They always possess the ability to embrace any philosophical or religious thoughts they wish.
Thus, a slave could often hold true to the principles of a philosophy or religion because of the freedom the slave possessed in their mind, heart and soul. Legal slave owners throughout history have realised this about fact about their slaves.
This is also the reality of consensual slavery, if not more so than for a legal slave. A consensual slave always has the power to end the relationship by walking away. And she has full legal protection to do so. She can willingly disobey her Master s orders. She might be punished for it, but she does have the free will to disobey if she so desires.
A Master does not possess any special power to suddenly change a girl s thoughts. He may try to convince and persuade her to think certain matters, but that can be done to anyone, slave or not. And still, that person must willingly accept the change of thought. A Master can tell a girl to commit certain actions, but that is control of her body not her mind. And I am sure no real time slave would commit any action that she considered a serious violation of her own morality, her own ethical principles.
If a slave was ordered to kill someone, or sever her own arm, I seriously doubt she would do so. And if she did, she would probably need serious psychological help. Even the Gor novels indicate the truth of this matter. How many slaves, who are considered excellent slaves with many years of training, show wilful disobedience at times? They retain their minds no matter how long their bondage. They may accept certain matters about their slavery, but it is their own voluntary acceptance. It is not an idea that their Master has forcefully changed.
Thus, a Gorean slave would be in a similar situation to a Gorean free man or free woman. To be Gorean, they would all have to follow the Gorean philosophy. And I fully believe that a slave can do so, can follow a Gorean philosophy. I do not believe the tenets of Gorean philosophy would conflict with her slavery.
In fact, they are likely to support such a condition. I have never heard anyone argue that any tenet of Gorean philosophy would conflict with someone who is a Gorean slave. Though to be honest, I have heard few people state that slaves also follow a Gorean philosophy. Most people do not seem to believe that it is possible for them to do so. They feel that the Master has the power to prevent them from doing so.
Now, a Gorean slave would tend to be owned by a Gorean Master. They could be owned by a non-Gorean Master but that would be a rarity. Now, if she were owned by a Gorean Master, then by definition her Master would also follow a Gorean philosophy. And if both of them, Master and slave, followed a Gorean philosophy, then there would be far less chance there would be any conflicts.
Logically, why would a Gorean man want his slave to oppose the Gorean philosophy? Why would he ever command her to commit acts against the philosophy? It makes far more sense that a Gorean Master would encourage his slave s acceptance and adherence to the Gorean philosophy.
Now, technically a Gorean Master could order his slave to commit an act against the philosophy. But why would he? And if he did, would that not indicate that his own adherence to the Gorean philosophy was lacking in some respect? I don t think this would be a common occurrence, and if it were, I would seriously question the Master s beliefs in the philosophy.
A man who values the Gorean philosophy certainly would not be encouraging others not to follow it. What should a slave do if confronted with such a dilemma, of being ordered to violate the philosophy? Obviously this would be best answered on a case-by-case basis. A girl could always disobey her Master and accept her punishment rather than violate the philosophy. That might be her best option in some situations. But, such dilemma should be a rarity, if at all. It might occur more if a Gorean slave had a non-Gorean Master.
Now, if one thus accepts that a Gorean slave does follow the Gorean philosophy, then the next important question arises, What is the Gorean philosophy? Obviously this is an extremely important question for all, not just slaves. But, the answers are not simple or short. And they should be addressed in their essays.
The scope of this essay was only to define what is meant by a Gorean slave. And that answer is simple, though possessing much depth.
Essentially, what defines a Gorean slave, as it defines any Gorean, is that she follows a Gorean philosophy.
Written by Ubar Luther in Gor-Now.net
Posted on 2020-05-08 by Azrael Phoenix
The Goreans have very different notions of morality from those of Earth.
Marauders of Gor, p.7
It seems simple enough that to be Gorean is to embrace a different notion of morality, how one determines what is right and wrong, than what most people of Earth embrace. Morality has long been a significant aspect of philosophy, at least since the time of Socrates, who is largely credited with being the first philosophy concerned with such issues. To follow a philosophy, but to exclude its morality, would be incomplete, rejecting an essential element. How can one be Gorean yet reject Gorean morality? How can one be Gorean and embrace Earth morality, sometime so different from Gorean morality?
Certainly can easily define what it means to be Gorean in any way they desire. It could even be defined as to exclude the necessity of Gorean morality. Yet is that not simply defining Gorean as to one s own personal preferences? Is that not creating a biased definition, a more subjective than objective one? If the books clearly state that Gorean morality is different than Earth morality, then why shouldn’t Gorean morality be essential to being Gorean? And if Gorean morality can be ignored, then what other aspects of Gorean philosophy can also be ignored?
If we accept the significance of Gorean morality to being Gorean then we next need to determine and explain the nature of Gorean morality. Fortunately the books provide a lengthy passage that largely does that. In addition, there are a number of other passages in the books that support this view of Gorean morality. Yet for some strange reason, the following is not one of the passages that often gets discussed. It is not a passage that is commonly seen on Gorean websites or message boards. Why is that so? We can try to address that answer later. For now, let us present that passage.
I wondered how men should live. In my chair I had thought long on such matters.
I knew only that I did not know the answer to this question. Yet it is an important question, is it not? Many wise men give wise answers to this question, and yet they do not agree among themselves.
Only the simple, the fools, the unreflective, the ignorant, know the answer to this question.
Perhaps to a question this profound the answer cannot be known. Perhaps it is a question too deep to be answered. Yet we do know there are false answers to such a question. This suggests that there may be a true answer, for how can there be falsity without truth?
One thing seems clear to me, that a morality which produces guilt and self-torture, which results in anxiety and agony, which shortens life spans, cannot be the answer.
Many of the competitive moralities of Earth are thus mistaken.
But what is not mistaken?
The Goreans have very different notions of morality from those of Earth.
Yet who is to say who is the more correct?
I envy sometimes the simplicities of those of Earth, and those of Gor, who, creatures of their conditioning, are untroubled by such matters, but I would not be as either of them. If either should be correct it is for them no more than a lucky coincidence. They would have fallen into truth, but to take truth for granted is not to know it. Truth not won is not possessed. We are not entitled to truths for which we have not fought.
Do we not learn to live by doing, as we learn to speak by speaking, to paint by painting, to build by building?
Those who know best how to live, sometimes it seems to me, are those least likely to be articulate in such skills. It is not that they have not learned but, having learned, they find they cannot tell what they know, for only words can be told, and what is learned in living is more than words, other than words, beyond words. We can say, This building is beautiful, but we do not learn the beauty of the building from the words; the building it is which teaches us its beauty; and how can one speak the beauty of the building, as it is? Does one say that it has so many pillars, that it has a roof of a certain type, and such? Can one simply say, The building is beautiful? Yes, one can say that but what one learns when one sees the beauty of the building cannot be spoken; it is not words; it is the building s beauty.
The morality of Earth, from the Gorean point of view, is a morality which would be viewed as more appropriate to slaves than free men. It would be seen in terms of the envy and resentment of inferiors for their superiors. It lays great stress on equalities and being humble and being pleasant and avoiding friction and being ingratiating and small. It is a morality in the best interest of slaves, who would be only too eager to be regarded as the equals of others. We are all the same. That is the hope of slaves; that is what it is in their interest to convince others of. The Gorean morality on the other hand is more one of inequalities, based on the assumption that individuals are not the same, but quite different in many ways. It might be said to be, though this is oversimple, a morality of masters. Guilt is almost unknown in Gorean morality, though shame and anger are not. Many Earth moralities encourage resignation and accommodation; Gorean morality is bent more toward conquest and defiance; many Earth moralities encourage tenderness, pity and gentleness, sweetness; Gorean morality encourages honor, courage, hardness and strength. To Gorean morality many Earth moralities might ask, Why so hard? To these Earth moralities, the Gorean ethos might ask, Why so soft?
I have sometimes thought that the Goreans might do well to learn something of tenderness, and, perhaps, that those of Earth might do well to learn something of hardness. But I do not know how to live. I have sought the answers, but I have not found them. The morality of slaves says, You are equal to me; we are both the same ; the morality of masters says, We are not equal; we are not the same; become equal to me; then we will be the same. The morality of slaves reduces all to bondage; the morality of masters encourages all to attain, if they can, the heights of freedom. I know of no prouder, more self-reliant, more magnificent creature than the free Gorean, male or female; they are often touchy, and viciously tempered, but they are seldom petty or small; moreover they do not hate and fear their bodies or their instincts; when they restrain themselves it is a victory over titanic forces; not the consequence of a slow metabolism; but sometimes they do not restrain themselves; they do not assume that their instincts and blood are enemies and spies; saboteurs in the house of themselves; they know them and welcome them as part of their persons; they are as little suspicious of them as the cat of its cruelty, or the lion of its hunger; their desire for vengeance, their will to speak out and defend themselves, their lust, they regard as intrinsically and gloriously a portion of themselves as their hearing and their thinking. Many Earth moralities make people little; the object of Gorean morality, for all its faults, is to make people free and great. These objectives are quite different it is clear to see. Accordingly, one would expect that the implementing moralities would, also, be considerably different.
(Marauders of Gor, p.7-9)
What is the context of this passage? At the start of Marauders of Gor, Tarl Cabot is sitting alone in the great hall within his residence in Port Kar. The left side of his body is paralyzed, an effect of wounds he suffered at the edge of the northern forests, possibility caused by poison. He begins thinking about how a person should live, something he has done often while sitting in this chair after his paralyzation. He then compares the moralities of Gor to those of Earth.
If we examine this passage, we see that Norman is stating that many Earth moralities, but not all, are slave moralities. He does not specifically identify which Earth moralities fall into that category but explains generalities about such moralities. Thus, one can examine for oneself which Earth moralities meet the conditions that Norman has outlined. In addition, Norman does not specifically identify the nature of Gorean morality, again providing generalities so that one can identify on their own to what he refers. Are the answers difficult? Can one easily identify the missing pieces? Has Norman provided sufficient clues to this puzzle?
To some individuals, the concepts within the above passage will seem very familiar. They will resonate within certain people, those who have a familiarity with the source material. Thus, the answers will be quite obvious to them. For others, who lack knowledge of the source material, the answers will be more difficult to discern. And there is a good chance that one might come to an incorrect conclusion. Especially as most people on Earth are unfamiliar with certain types of morality, and thus would not readily think of those unknown moralities as possible solutions.
This is one possible reason why this passage is rarely discussed online. For if numerous people are unsure as to the meaning of the passage, they may not wish to show their ignorance and raise the issue. There often seems to be a reluctance to ask questions, and thus evidence that one may not know something. Especially if such individuals claim that they are Gorean. For if they claim to be Gorean, but cannot identify what Gorean morality entails, then asking questions could reflect poorly on their claim to be Gorean.
Master morality vs. slave morality. Hardness vs. softness. Inequality vs equality. Resentment. Cruelty. These terms and concepts did not originate with Norman. In fact, Norman essentially paraphrased some key elements from the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, a famous and controversial German philosopher of the nineteenth century. So, to better understand what Norman intended, one needs to examine Nietzsche s view in this area. Norman did not add to or alter Nietzsche s views in the above passage. Thus, it appears he is adopting Nietzsche s beliefs concerning morality for Gor.
If one feels Nietzsche is irrelevant to a discussion of Gorean morality, then one must address the reasons why Norman clearly paraphrased Nietzsche s views. Why would Norman do so if he did not intend to rely on Nietzsche s views? Where is the evidence that Norman s views differ from Nietzsche in this regard? If it does differ, how does it then differ from Nietzsche? It is only logical that if Norman paraphrased Nietzsche when discussing Gorean morality, then Norman intended to use Nietzsche s view on morality to explain Gorean morality. And if one delves deeper into the subject, one will find much support for this proposition within the Gor novels.
Although the beginnings of Nietzsche s views on morality can be found in his earlier works, such as Daybreak and Human, All Too Human, it first was stated in full within Beyond Good and Evil and then later expanded in On the Genealogy of Morals. It is these two later books that address master morality and slave morality. Nietzsche praised master morality and saw slave morality as detrimental to mankind. At its simplest, master morality is based on virtue ethics and is best exemplified by the ancient Athenian Greeks. Slave morality is based on action-centered/rules based morality and derives from feelings of resentment against superiors, oppressors and masters. It is best exemplified by Christianity, Judaism and Kant.
So, let us now read a sampling of some quotes from Nietzsche concerning such morality. This will then give us some understanding of Nietzsche s views and how they apply to Gorean morality.
Beyond Good & Evil by Friedrich Nietzsche
This inversion of values (which includes using the word poor as synonymous with holy and friend ) constitutes the significance of the Jewish people: they mark the beginning of the slave rebellion in morals. (Part 5, Chapter 195)
In the beginning, the noble caste was always the barbarian caste: their predominance did not lie mainly in physical strength but in strength of the soul they were more whole human beings (which also means, at every level, more whole beasts ). (Part 9, Chapter 257)
Their fundamental faith simply has to be that society must not exist for society s sake but only as the foundation and scaffolding on which a choice type of being is able to raise itself to its higher task and to a higher state of being— (Part 9, Chapter 258)
There are master morality and slave morality I add immediately that in all the higher and more mixed cultures there also appear attempts at mediation between these two moralities, and yet more often the interpenetration and mutual misunderstandings of both, and at times they occur directly alongside each other even in the same human being, within a single soul. The moral discrimination of values has originated either among a ruling group whose consciousness of its difference from the ruled group was accompanied by delight or among the ruled, the slaves and dependents of every degree.
In the first case, when the ruling group determines what is good, these exalted, proud states of the soul are experienced as conferring distinction and determining the order of rank. The noble human being separates from himself those in whom the opposite of such exalted, proud states finds expression: he despises them. It should be noted immediately that in this first type of morality the opposition of good and bad means approximately the same as noble and contemptible. (The opposition of good and evil has a different origin.) One feels contempt for the cowardly, the anxious, the petty, those intent on narrow utility; also for the suspicious with their unfree glances, those who humble themselves, the doglike people who allow themselves to be maltreated, the begging flatterers, above all the liars; it is part of the fundamental faith of all aristocrats that the common people lie. We truthful ones thus the nobility of ancient Greece referred to itself. (Part 9, Chapter 260)
It is obvious that moral designations were everywhere first applied to human beings and only later, derivatively, to actions. (Part 9, Chapter 260)
The noble type of man experiences itself as determining values; it does not need approval; it judges, what is harmful to me is harmful in itself ; it knows itself to be that which first accords honor to things; it is value creating. Everything it knows as part of itself it honors; such a morality is self-glorification. In the foreground there is the feeling of fullness, of power that seeks to overflow, the happiness of high tension, the consciousness of wealth that would give and bestow: the noble human being, too, helps the unfortunate, but not, or almost not, from pity, but prompted more by an urge begotten by excess of power. The noble human being honors himself as one who is powerful, also as one who has power over himself, who knows how to speak and be silent, who delights in being severe and hard with himself and respects all severity and hardness. (Part 9, Chapter 260)
It is the powerful who understand how to honor; this is their art, their realm of invention. The profound reverence for age and tradition all law rests on this double reverence the faith and prejudice in favor of ancestors and disfavor of those yet to come are typical of the morality of the powerful; and when the men of modern ideas, conversely, believe almost instinctively in progress and the future and more and more lack respect for age, this in itself would sufficiently betray the ignoble origin of these ideas. (Part 9, Chapter 260)
According to slave morality, those who are evil thus inspire fear; according to master morality it is precisely those who are good that inspire, and wish to inspire fear, while the bad are felt to be contemptible. (Part 9, Chapter 260)
Wherever slave morality becomes preponderant, language tends to bring the words good and stupid closer together. (Part 9, Chapter 260)
The Genealogy of Morals by Friedrich Nietzsche
A certain amount of historical and philological training together with a native fastidiousness in matters of psychology, before long transformed this problem into another, to wit, Under what conditions did man construct the value judgments good and evil? And what is their intrinsic worth? Have they thus far benefited or retarded mankind? Do they betoken misery, curtailment, degeneracy or, on the contrary, power, fullness of being, energy, courage in the face of life, and confidence in the future? (Preface, Chapter III)
, that it was the Jews who started the slave revolt in morals; a revolt with two millenia of history behind it, which we have lost sight of today simply because it has triumphed so completely. (First Essay, Chapter VII)
But what is all this talk about nobler values? Let us face facts: the people have triumphed or the slaves, the mob, the herd, whatever you wish to call them and if the Jews brought it about, then no nation ever had a more universal mission on this earth. The lords are a thing of the past, and the ethics of the common man is completely triumphant. (First Essay, Chapter VIII)
The slave revolt in morals begins by rancor turning creative and giving birth to values the rancor of beings who, deprived of the direct outlet of action, compensate by an imaginary vengeance. (First Essay, Chapter VIII)
All truly noble morality grows out of triumphant self-affirmation. (First Essay, Chapter VIII)
Slave ethics, on the other hand, begins by saying no to an outside, an other, a non-self, and that no is its creative act. This reversal of direction of the evaluating look, this invariable looking outward instead of inward, is a fundamental feature of rancor. Slave ethics requires for its inception a sphere different from and hostile to its own. Physiologically speaking, it requires an outside stimulus in order to act at all; all its action is reaction. The opposite is true of aristocratic valuations; such values grow and act spontaneously, seeking out their contraries only in order to affirm themselves even more gratefully and delightedly. Here the negative concepts, humble, base, bad, are late, pallid counterparts of the positive, intense and passionate credo, We noble, good, beautiful, happy ones. (First Essay, Chapter X)
Whereas the noble lives before his own conscience with confidence and frankness (gennaios nobly bred emphasizes the nuance truthful and perhaps also ingenuous ), the rancorous person is neither truthful nor ingenuous nor honest and forthright with himself. His soul squints; his mind loves hide-outs, secret paths, and back doors; everything that is hidden seems to him his own world, his security, his comfort; he is expert in silence, in long memory, in waiting, in provisional self-depreciation, and in self-humiliation. (First Essay, Chapter X)
When a noble man feels resentment, it is absorbed in his instantaneous reaction and therefore does not poison him. Moreover, in countless cases where we might expect it, it never arises, while with weak and impotent people it occurs without fail. (First Essay, Chapter X)
The exact opposite is true of the noble-minded, who spontaneously creates the notion good, and later derives from it the conception of the bad. How ill-matched these two concepts look, placed side by side: the bad of noble origin, and the evil that has risen out of the cauldron of unquenched hatred! The first is a by-product, a complementary color, almost an afterthought; the second is the beginning, the original creative act of slave ethics. (First Essay, Chapter XI)
But neither is the conception of good the same in both cases, as we soon find out when we ask ourselves who it is that is really evil according to the code of rancor. The answer is: precisely the good one of the opposite code, that is reenvisaged by the poisonous eye of resentment. (First Essay, Chapter XI)
The Romans were the strongest and most noble people who ever lived. Every vestige of them, every least inscription, is a sheer delight, provided we are able to read the spirit behind the writing. (First Essay, Chapter XVI)
Now, some of the above quotes may seem difficult to comprehend. Nietzsche is not the easiest of philosophers to understand, for several different reasons. So, it can be beneficial to rely on other philosophers to assist in deciphering the meaning of Nietzsche s words, helping to build our comprehension. So, let us present another sampling of quotes which can hopefully benefit our understanding.
What Nietzsche Really Said by Robert C. Solomon & Kathleen M. Higgins (Schocken Books 2000)
The watchword of Nietzsche s ethics comes, predictably, from the ancients, in this case from the Greek poet, Pindar (522-438 B.C.E.). Nietzsche writes, over and over again, Become who you are! (Page 105)
Each of us, Nietzsche says, has a unique set of virtues, but by thinking that what we really are is defined by a set of general rules or principles (categorical imperatives), we deny that uniqueness and sacrifice those virtues to the bland and anonymous category of being a good person. (Page 106)
It is not that Nietzsche wants to defend immorality but rather that he wants to defend the idea of human excellence that defines his ethics. (Page 106)
To live a good life one must live in a great city was a platitude among the ancients. (Page 107)
Nietzsche, to put the matter simply, is more like Aristotle than like Kant. In contemporary terminology, he defends an ethics of virtue rather than an ethics of rational principles or obligations. (Page 107)
What Nietzsche sometimes condemns as herd morality he also describes as slave morality, a morality fit for slaves and servants. (Page 108)
Morality, in the singular sense presented in the Bible and defended by Kant, is slave morality. In its most crude forms it consists of general principles imposed from above (by the rulers or by God) that yoke and constrain the individual. In its subtler and more sophisticated forms, that external authority is relocated internally in the faculty of reason, for example. But what is most characteristic of Morality in either its crude or its sophisticated forms is that it is mainly prohibitive and constraining rather than inspiring. (Page 108-9)
Master morality, by contrast, is an ethics of virtue, an ethics in which personal excellence is primary. (Page 109)
Achieving excellence is precisely what makes one happy, according to both Nietzsche and Aristotle. (Page 109)
Slaves do not like themselves, so the idea of becoming who you are is not particularly appealing. (Page 110)
Master morality takes as its watchword Become who you are, and whether or not one turns out to be like anyone else, or even whether or not one is acceptable to others, are matters of no concern. (Page 110)
Putting it simply, one might summarize master morality as being myself, and getting what I want, with the understanding that what one is and what one wants may be quite refined and noble. (To interpret getting what I want as an expression of selfishness reflects an impoverishment of desire, a sure sign of slave morality.) Not getting what one wants is bad, not necessarily in any larger sense (such as causing disastrous consequences for the community, or violating God s laws and inviting divine retribution) but simply because it falls short of one s own aspirations and ideals. (Page 110)
For the slaves, by contrast, getting what one wants is just too difficult, too unlikely, too implausible. Slaves do not like themselves, so the idea of becoming who you are is not particularly appealing. (Page 110)
But one might say that the perspective of master morality is in fact an aesthetic perspective. It has to do with what is beautiful and excellent rather than what is right or obligatory. Slave morality, by contrast, has only to do with good and evil; aesthetic considerations are ruled out, and the ominousness of evil dominates the conversation. (Page 110-111)
In slave morality, the simple distinction between good and bad gets replaced by the metaphysical distinction between good and evil. (Page 111)
The contrast between slave morality and master morality ultimately comes down to this emotional difference: that the slave nurtures resentment until it poisons him, while the master, noble and self-secure, expresses his feelings and frustrations. (Page 114)
Nietzsche s emphasis on nobility and resentment in his account of master and slave morality is an attempt to stress character, motivation, and virtue (and with them, tradition and culture) above all else in ethics. A Master morality of nobility is an expression of good, strong character. (Page 115)
But one might say that the perspective of master morality is in fact an aesthetic perspective. It has to do with what is beautiful and excellent rather than what is right or obligatory. Slave morality, by contrast, has only to do with good and evil; aesthetic considerations are ruled out, and the ominousness of evil dominates the conversation. (Page 210-211)
Living With Nietzsche: What the Great “Immoralist” Has to Teach Us by Robert C. Solomon (Oxford University Press 2003)
“Slavish values tend to deny joy and celebrate seriousness, decry risk and danger and emphasize security. They encourage cautious reflection and reject or demean passion and ‘instinct.’ In short, they “say ‘no’ to life.” (Page 21)
“Nietzsche’s theory of morality is suggested in his ‘middle works” Daybreak and Gay Science but first fully spelled out in Beyond Good and Evil (1886) and, especially, in his On the Genealogy of Morals (1887).” (Page 25)
“He contends that what we call ‘morality’ originated among the miserable slaves, the Lumpenproletariat of the ancient world (that is, the lowest classes of society, a term introduced by Marx.) Morality continues to be motivated by the servile and resentful emotions of those who are ‘poor in spirit’ and feel themselves to be inferior. ‘Morality,’ however brilliantly rationalized by Immanuel Kant as the dictates of Practical Reason or by the utilitarians as ‘greatest good for the greatest number,’ is essentially the devious strategy of the weak to gain some advantage (or at least not be at a disadvantage) vis- -vis the strong.” (Page 25-26)
“He contrasts slave morality with what he variously calls ‘noble’ and ‘master’ morality, which he presents much more positively.” (Page 44)
“Slave morality, according to Nietzsche, is obsessed with the category of evil, and its virtues are for the most part banal and mere obedience.” (Page 52)
“The core claim of virtue ethics is the importance of moral character and virtues of character in determining moral worth.” (Page 54)
“An action performed out of noble sentiments is a noble action, even if the act itself turns out to be rather insignificant and inconsequential. An action expressing vicious sentiments will be vicious, even if (through error in judgment, by chance or by some sublime act of fate) it turns out to have benign consequences.” (Page 54)
“Resentment, for example, is above all an emotion obsessed with power and status-or rather, with the comparative lack of them. An ethics based on resentment, then, would strive ultimately to satisfy the resentment, even at the expense of pleasure and happiness.” (Page 55-56)
“The emotions, according to Nietzsche, can be divided into two categories. In Twilight, he famously refers to these as the ‘life-enhancing’ and the ‘life-stultifying’ passions.” (Page 81-82)
“Among those passions Nietzsche recognizes as ‘life-stultifying,’ the one which he by far spends most of his energy attacking is the singularly malevolent emotion of resentment, which he calls ressentiment.” (Page 89)
“Slave morality, he tells us, is a defensive reaction against the values of the more powerful, a reaction that is born of resentment.” (Page 89)
“Resentment is most obviously directed against others (as opposed to love and pity, for instance), but unlike hatred and contempt, for instance, it does so from a marked perspective of inferiority. Rather than taking responsibility for one’s own inferior position, resentment always projects the responsibility onto other people (or groups or institutions). Simply stated, resentment is a vitriolic emotion that is always aimed outward and whose presupposition is one’s own sense of oppression or inferiority.” (Page 90)
“The ancient Hebrews and then the early Christians, Nietzsche argues, simmered with resentment against their ancient masters and concocted a fabulous philosophical strategy. Instead of seeing themselves as failures in the competition for wealth and power, they turned the tables (‘revalued’) their values and turned their resentment into self-righteousness. Morality is the product of this self-righteous resentment, which is not nearly so concerned with living the good life as it is with chastising those who do live it.” (Page 90)
“Resentment undermines claims to authority, according to Nietzsche, because it is essentially pathetic. It is an expression of weakness and impotence. Nietzsche is against resentment because it is an emotion of the weak that the strong and powerful do not and cannot feel.” (Page 92)
“Resentment is an emotion that does not promote personal excellent but rather dwells on competitive strategy and thwarting others. It does not do what a virtue or a proper motive ought to do-fore Nietzsche as for Aristotle-and that is to inspire excellence and self-confidence in both oneself and others.” (Page 92)
“What is wrong with resentment is that it interferes with the good life as Nietzsche conceives of it, a life of rich ‘inner’ experience as opposed to a life of reaction against external threats and slights. It is thus a life-demeaning and life-stultifying emotion.” (Page 101)
“I said that resentment is an emotion that is distinguished, first of all, by its concern and involvement with power. It is the self-recognition of one’s own inferiority, and a desperate attempt nevertheless to salvage or create what power one can. Resentment is life-stultifying because it focuses all of one’s energy on this salvage attempt.” (Page 102)
“But physical and military prowess is not the ‘power” that Nietzsche is endorsing, “ (Page 105)
“Buts as so often in Nietzsche, morality, strength, and weakness get viewed in aesthetic terms.” (Page 106)
In Birth of Tragedy, he says that the Greeks were ‘beautiful’ because they had the strength to endure their suffering and render it creative.” (Page 106)
“What was ‘beautiful’ and ‘noble’ in the Greeks was their ‘self-overcoming,’ not their blithe self-confidence.” (Page 106)
“Slaves, by contrast, are ‘ugly’ because they are banal and boring. Their demeanor is servile and timid. They protect themselves with humorless, submissive smiles, withour character.” (Page 106)
“Nietzsche insisted instead that life is not meaningless. Life is good, even if it is filled with suffering. The Greeks knew this. That is why, in Nietzsche’s words, ‘they were so beautiful.’ (Page 117)
“But what is critical to an ethics of practice is not the absence of rules; it is rather the overriding importance of the concept of excellence or virtue (ar te).” (Page 122)
“Nietzsche’s ethics, like Aristotle’s, can best be classified in introductory ethics readers as an ethics of ‘self-realization.’ ‘Become who you are’ is the slogan in the middle writings: the telos of the Ubermensch serves as an ideal from Thus Spake Zarathustra on. Indeed, who is the Ubermensch if not Aristotle’s megalopsychos, ‘the great-souled man’ from whom Nietzsche even borrows much of his master-type’ terminology. He is the ideal who ‘deserves and claims great things.'” (Page 129-30)
“The rejection of bourgeois morality does not dictate cruelty but rather places an emphasis on excellence. The will to power is not Reich but Macht and not supremacy but superiority.” (Page 130)
“Though Nietzsche may shock us with his elitist and warrior language, the Ubermenschen near to his heart are his aesthetic comrades, ‘philosophers, saints and artists.’ The unspoken but always present thesis is this: It is in the romantic practice of artistic creativity that modern excellence can be achieved and in an exquisite sense of personal taste and experience that it is realized.” (Page 130-31)
“Elitism is not itself an ethics. Indeed, I think both Aristotle and Nietzsche might well object to it as such. It is rather the presupposition that people’s talents and abilities differ. It is beginning with what is the case.” (Page 131)
“The purpose of an ethics is to maximize people’s potential, to encourage the most and best from all of them, but more by far from the best of them.” (Page 131)
“It is the simple recognition that true talents (and the cultures that encourage their development) are very rare. It is also the recognition that any universal rule-however ingeniously formulated and equally applied-will be disadvantageous to someone, especially if it is the development of artistic talent and not politics that we have in mind. It is also an enormous waste as well as unfair (both authors worry more about the former than the latter) for the strong to be limited by the weak, the productive limited by the unproductive, the creative limited by the uncreative.” (Page 131)
“It will not do to mask the point by saying that elitism does not treat people unequally, only differently. It presumes inequality from the outset and defends it by appeal to the larger picture. Aristotle does this by appeal to the well-being of the city-state and the natural order of things, Nietzsche by a more abstract but very modern romantic appeal to human creativity.” (Page 131)
“What is essential to this view of ethics-let us not call it elitist ethics but rather an ethics of virtue, areteic ethics-is that the emphasis is wholly on excellence, a teleological conception. The virtues are both conducive to and constitutive of rich, aesthetic experience, and it is such experience that justifies both the virtues and the life that embraces them.” (Page 131)
“What counts for much less is obedience of rules, laws, and principles, for one can be wholly obedient and also dull, unproductive, unimaginative, and a philistine.” (Page 131)
“He advocated a very different way of thinking about ethics, one that encouraged living life to the fullest and cultivating a rich inner life.” (Page 137)
“What is ultimately good, according to this viewpoint, is virtuous character, a person with the right virtues, a person with integrity or what Nietzsche calls ‘nobility.'” (Page 137)
“There is much they share in common, beginning with the warrior culture that Aristotle lived in and Nietzsche fantasized through his reading of the Greeks. Thus courage, for both of them, is the chief virtue, the one that provides something for all of the others.” (Page 139)
“Another critical shared feature, natural to the Greek ar te but lost in the translation to German Tugend or English virtue, is the linkage between virtue and excellence, that is, extraordinary achievement rather than merely appropriate behavior. Nietzsche, like Aristotle, is interested in the ‘great-souled man,’ the hero-aristocrat, not just ‘being a good person.'”(Page 139)
“Philosophically, what is of particular interest is that neither of their accounts of the virtues makes very much use of the supposedly basic distinction between ‘moral’ and non-moral’ virtues.” (Page 139)
“.., I would suggest we follow Swanton, who defines a virtue as “a trait-specifically a human excellence whose possession tends to enable, facilitate, make natural the possessor’s promoting, expressing, honoring, and appreciating value; or enhancing, expressing, honoring or appreciating valuable objects or states of affairs which are valuable.” The emphasis on excellent is important because I would read Nietzsche as insisting that no virtue is good ‘in itself,’ but only as it contributes to something else of value, such as personal style and character, the production of beauty, an ecstatic personal experience, or the cultural enrichment of society.” (Page 140)
“It is unfortunate, perhaps, that although Nietzsche clearly wants to defend aesthetic and artistic values and virtues, he so enjoys warrior-like metaphors that his perspective is easily lost or misread as something brutal and cruel.” (Page 140)
“But more generally, Nietzsche defends a conception of ethics that has not (and had not) been adequately appreciated, either in contemporary ethics or in nineteenth-century German philosophy. And that is an ethics that focuses on the virtues and excellence, and the aesthetic virtues and excellences in particular.” (Page 142)
“I have already suggested that courage, for Nietzsche as for Aristotle, serves as a key virtue and something of a prototype for all of the virtues. But for Nietzsche as for Aristotle, courage is not limited to or for that matter mainly concerned with battlefield bravery that both of them take as their apparent paradigm (or, in Nietzsche’s case, as his most prevalent source of metaphors). There is, as I mentioned, the courage of one’s convictions, which in the case of iconoclast Nietzsche was certainly more of a challenge than for good-old-boy Aristotle. There is the courage of facing up to life, “ (Page 148)
“Indeed, one tempting way to summarize Nietzsche’s entire ethics is to say, like Confucius, that all moral values become aesthetic values, and one should look at one’s life, as at the world, through aesthetic lenses, as ‘a work of art.'” (Page 163)
“To see the world as beautiful, despite suffering, even because of suffering, remains one of his most explicit aspirations throughout his philosophy and one that he would certainly urge upon us.” (Page 163)
“Nietzsche’s insistence on ‘hardness,’ too, is misunderstood, typically as part of his dubious campaign against compassion and pity. But, Nietzsche put a strong emphasis on self-discipline.” (Page 170)
The above is a lot of material to digest. But, after a careful examination and analysis of this information, comparing it to Gorean philosophy and morality, one will see the obvious applicability. And one will better comprehend what it means to be Gorean. Simply, Gorean morality is a type of virtue ethics, a master morality.
Written by Ubar Luther in Gor-Now.net
Posted on 2020-05-08 by Azrael Phoenix
Written by Marcus of Ar in 1996
by _Marcus_ of Ar
WHAT IS THE PHILOSOPHY OF GOR?
That is a difficult question to answer; there are as many philosophies upon Gor as there are people to embrace them. Rather than ask what is the philosophy of Gor, perhaps it is better to examine ALL of the philosophies of Gor, and try to discover the unifying factors which they have in common. These, then, are the basic tenets upon which Gorean philosophy is based.
Throughout the 25 books which make up the chronicles of the Counter-Earth, certain principles and beliefs are often repeated, which the narrator proclaims are widely held by Goreans in general.
I have selected several of these, the principles which in my opinion seem to be the foundation for the basic Gorean system of ethics:
1) Be WHAT you are: Similar in many respects to a tenet set forth by the Earth philosopher Marcus Aurelius; namely that each thing which exists possesses its own unique singularity. When a thing attempts to be something it is not, problems arise. A man is a man; a woman is a woman; a tree is a tree; a flower is a flower. To the Gorean mind, it is foolish for anything to assume the properties of another thing.Therefore, each person is required to understand his or her basic nature, and to abide by it. According to such a tenet, therefore, it is assumed that there are needs, desires and activities which are specifically masculine, and those which are specifically feminine. Though the lines may blur at times, when all things are reduced to their basic forms, each thing is appreciated and celebrated for its own uniqueness, and is not forced to assume properties of another, different, thing.
2) Be WHO you are: This tenet applies in regard to a person’s existence in society and the caste structure. It takes into account the fact that everyone possesses certain talents and abilities from birth, regardless of their familial caste. Therefore, upon Gor a person is free to alter or raise his or her caste on the basis of ability, though it is rarely done, since most Goreans value their familial caste as a badge of their clan identity. But the above principle also applies in regard to freedom and slavery. To the Gorean mindset, each person is born with a desire for freedom, and an innate slave nature. A person’s proper place in society is dependant upon how these two factors are balanced within the personality of that particular Gorean. Most Goreans believe that anyone who has within them a burning desire to exist free of strictures will not suffer slavery, dying rather than submitting to bonditude. A person who has within them a strong slave nature, the desire to be controlled and commanded, will eventually succumb to their inner need to serve others, free of all responsibility to things other than themselves and their service.
3) Obey the Natural Order of things: This tenet applies to the way Goreans view the world around them. They feel it is futile to attempt to disregard the effect of hundreds of generations of evolution. If a creature is naturally genetically equipped to fulfill a specific function in relation to another, then it is considered fitting and proper that such a creature be allowed to do so, even when such natural predisposition might result in stratification. In regards to human beings, it is understood that stronger, more intelligent, and more ambitious human beings will naturally assume a higher social strata in regards to their interaction with the less strong, less intelligent, and less ambitious. In regard to male/female sexual relations, it is therefore the right of the male, who is genetically predisposed for physical dominance, to control the physical aspects of his relationship to the female. In return, he is expected to behave as the hunter/provider, seeing to the protection of the female to insure the propagation of the race. Females, meanwhile, who tend to be smaller and less physically powerful, are expected to respect the biological truths of their lesser physical stature, while making the most of their genetic predisposition to serve and aid the male, and utilizing their superior emotional empathy and long-term endurance to do so while surviving and advancing the species. Not all women, therefore, are slaves, though the female sex is often referred to by males as “the slave sex.” Gorean females are simply expected to respect and understand that they are less able in areas requiring raw physical strength than their male counterparts, and adjust their behavior accordingly. When one considers the fact that personal combat to the death is a daily occurrence throughout Gor, such behavior among Gorean women is a wise practice to say the least.
4) Advancement of the Strong: This tenet is similar to that described above; it simply refers to the common Gorean belief that strength, whether it is physical strength, mental strength, or strength of will, should be celebrated and set forth as an example. In this way the Gorean feels he advances the human race, adding to its chances for survival and continued existence.
5) Diminishment of the Causes of Weakness: This principle acts as the inverse to the tenet described above. In order that the human species may grow stronger, it is necessary that the weaker and lesser adaptive elements of Gorean society be carefully controlled and encouraged to grow in strength and adaptability. Anti-social elements are to be excised from society through restriction of citizenship, or confined and rehabilitated. Warfare and enforced captivity are two methods by which this last end is accomplished upon the surface of the planet Gor.
6) Do what you will: This is one of the key principles to Gorean philosophy; basically, it means that every Gorean is expected to strive within the limits of his or her existence to achieve self-fulfillment and lasting happiness. A Warrior may draw his sword and lead an army to conquer a city, if he is strong enough and fit enough to do so. A free woman may attempt to contract a profitable companionship or to build a financial empire, if she is strong enough and clever enough. Even a slave is expected to seek her deepest self-fulfillment within the bonds of her Master’s chains. In such a manner, each Gorean is expected to strive and achieve something for the collective Gorean society, and struggle to attain perfection within the structure of that society. To the Gorean mind, there are always possibilities for advancement no matter what the situation.
7) Responsibility for One’s Actions: This tenet is based upon the Gorean concept of basic “cause and effect.” It is through the practice of this principle that the rest of the tenets listed above make sense, and function. This is the belief that everyone, no matter how great or humble, chooses the course of his or her destiny. When a warrior draws his sword, he can expect to suffer the consequences. When a Gorean submits to the bonds of slavery, he or she is expected to acknowledge and accept what occurs afterward. In such a way every choice made by every single Gorean is inextricably bound together with the choices of his or her fellow Goreans in a great interlinking web of cause and effect, a massive net of fate which moves the race forward into the future like an unstoppable juggernaut. Do whatever you want to, but expect it to effect you, either for good or ill. You are responsible for yourself.
Excuses are futile and no one wants to hear them anyway. If you screw up, take your medicine, deal with the situation and move on to the next thing. The basic rules and maxims of the various caste codes and the fundamental principles of Gorean interaction seem to be based mostly upon this concept; this, in effect, is the explanation for Gorean “cruelty.” Goreans are not cruel, they are practical. “That which does not kill them makes them stronger,” to paraphrase from Nietzsche.
If you wear the collar of a slave, look like a slave, act like a slave, and do not either fight your way to freedom or die in the attempt, then you must really be one. In any case, you most probably were free at one point… so what happened? You either needed to be a slave, were too weak to stay free, or screwed up really badly somewhere along the way. Whatever the case, deal with it. Life is not fair, and most Goreans are far to practical to try to make it so. Life sucks. If you get hit on the head, don’t waste time crying about it… accept it and next time wear a helmet.
8) Stratification by Natural Process: Superior strength– be it strength of will, strength of body, or strength of mind– will tend naturally to manifest itself among ordered human groupings. Even particulars such as sexual gender do not universally define how matters of strength are involved in the stratification process. Anyone who is stronger will naturally assume a position of dominance, be it mental or physical, over those weaker or less willing to match themselves in human dominance struggles. Therefore, it is categorically incorrect to assign presumed dominance or blanket superiority over anyone, or any one grouping, within the human condition, since these matters tend to be somewhat situational. While human beings are defined to a great extent by their sex, there is no “dominance gene” nor is there any “submission gene.” There are only combinations of heritable genes, each of which will render the individual more prone to certain behaviors than others. These genetic leanings can be circumvented, though typically the act of doing so is costly, both to the individual involved and to the system in which he or she functions.
The final tenet, listed above, has only one interpretation: if anyone, be they male or female, possesses the ability to dominate others, he or she will naturally tend to do so when the opportunity presents itself, even against his or her preexistent genetic propensities. It is when the dominance factor clashes with the biologically engrained sexual selection pressures, and circumvents preprogrammed sexual-based survival behaviors, that the human being becomes, to paraphrase Norman, “a mass of conflicting drives and emotions, more prone to heightened mental stress, physical illness, psychological disease and a substantially shortened lifespan.”
Gorean philosophy is, in many cases, a zero-sum equation. A Gorean must look within himself for the strength to contain his emotions, so that he may see with objectivity what is needed and required to bolster the Gorean philosophies and maintain his honor through positive action.
This, then, is my perception of basic Gorean philosophy. It may not seem fair to you, or perhaps even make much sense from your particular point of view, but I doubt most Goreans care. They have little time for debate, as they are too busy living.
To paraphrase the words of a well known Gorean author: An Earthling might very well examine the principles of Gorean philosophy and ask the question: “Why so hard?”
A Gorean would probably shrug, examine the principles of modern Earth philosophy, and answer with the question: “Why so soft?”
Of course, that’s just an opinion. I could be wrong.
_Marcus_
Original copyright © 1996, Marcus of Ar. All Rights Reserved.
Revised, copyright © 2002, Marcus of Ar. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.silkandsteel.com/3k/marcphil.htm
Posted on 2020-05-08 by Azrael Phoenix
Since the saga of the Books of GOR have started back in 1966 many texts have already been written and many persons have spent countless hours studying and sharing information to help others understand better what is GOR.
One of these persons is known as “Ubar Luther” who wrote a series of papers (most seem to be over 15 to 20 years old, but still very up-to-date in many topics) called the “Luther’s Gorean Educational Scrolls” that are still available in Gor-Now.net. I have tried to reach Luther for some time and the contact links seem not to be working, but will keep a look and hope he one day resumes his magnificent writing!
I’m going to share the information of his scroll regarding the Warrior Caste, dividing it into three Posts:
Warrior Sayings
There are also sayings of the warriors which may or may not be actual parts of the codes but which are commonly followed.
“The bite of the ost to be one of the cruelest ways to die.”
Outlaw of Gor, p.118
“Be strong and do as you will. The swords of others will set you your limits.”
Marauders of Gor, p.10
“A warrior takes what he wishes.”
Outlaw of Gor, p.28
“I am of the Warriors. I will take by the sword what women please me.”
Beasts of Gor, p.348
“Steel is the coinage of the warrior. With it he purchases what pleases him.”
Marauders of Gor, p.10
“Within the circle of each man’s sword, therein is each man a Ubar.”
Marauders of Gor, p.10
“Until you find (someone or something), your companion is peril and steel.”
Priest Kings of Gor, p.307 and Nomads of Gor, p.287
“A sword must drink until its thirst is satisfied.”
Guardsman of Gor, p.17
“Where weapons may not be carried, it is well to carry weapons.”
Marauders of Gor, p.41
“Did he think that the color of a fellow’s garments was what made him a warrior? Surely he must realize that one not of the warriors might affect the scarlet, and that one who wore the grimed gray of a peasant, one barefoot, and armed only with the great staff, might be of the scarlet caste. It is not the uniform which makes the warrior, the soldier.”
Magicians of Gor, p.129
“There are no mere points of honor.”
Vagabonds of Gor, p.63
“Tears are not unbecoming to the soldier The soldier is a man of deep passions, and emotion. Many men cannot even understand his depths. Do not fear your currents and your powers. In the soldier are flowers and storms. Each is a part of him, and each is real. Accept both. Deny neither.”
Guardsman of Gor, p.238
“No one can take the scarlet from you, once it is granted, unless it be by the sword.”
Tribesman of Gor, p.218
“There is no incompatibility between letters and arms. The greatest soldiers are often gifted men.”
Mercenaries of Gor, p.48
“Many are the causes of Gor and so too, many are the captains. Many captains choose their causes on the scales of merchants, weighing their iron against gold.”
Mercenaries of Gor, p.48
“Steel can always command a price.”
Explorers of Gor, p.86
“Causes exist that men may fight.”
Guardsman of Gor, p.16
“War is a perilous and exhilarating sport, a game of warriors and Ubars.”
Vagabonds of Gor, p.18
“It is no dishonor to surrender.”
Beasts of Gor, p.421
“There is a time and place for speaking, as there is a time and place for steel.”
Slave Girl of Gor, p.269
“Not everyone who is of the Warriors knows that he is of the Warriors.”
Rogue of Gor, p.317
“Is it not a paradox? Men need us in order to bring about a world in which we may be scorned and disregarded ..Men seldom recall whom it was who brought them the fruits of victory.”
Beasts of Gor, p.31
“I had heard warriors say that they would rather be poisoned by a woman than slain by an arrow.”
Raiders of Gor, p.4
“The steel, as is often the case, had seemed to think for itself.”
Savages of Gor, p.92
“The cynical, mercantile mind will never understand the mind of the soldier.”
Explorers of Gor, p.229
Written by “Ubar Luther” in Gor-Now.net